The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with a Southern District of Indiana judge who granted a preliminary injunction preventing
Indianapolis from enforcing the 2002 ordinance that regulates adult-bookstore business hours.
After hearing arguments Sept. 20 in Annex Books, Inc., et al. v. City of Indianapolis, Ind., No.
09-4156, the federal appellate court issued a per curium opinion today upholding U.S. District Judge Sarah Evans Barker’s
preliminary injunction. Judge Barker heard the case on remand from the 7th Circuit after the appellate court concluded the
city of Indianapolis needed evidence about the effects of the law it enacted that required adult bookstores to be closed certain
hours of the day.
At a hearing before the District Court, Indianapolis offered one piece of evidence: a study that said dispersing adult stores
that sell items for off-site reading or viewing reduced crime in Sioux City, Iowa. But this article didn’t support Indianapolis’
position because it deals with dispersal instead of an hour-of-operation ordinance. The study also didn’t attempt to
control for other variables.
The adult bookstores offered the arrest data from Indianapolis near its stores that showed the number of arrests didn’t
decrease once the ordinance took effect. These numbers weren't subjected to statistical analysis, but the Circuit judges
found they imply that the change in business hours didn’t produce any measurable benefit.
The Circuit judges also suggested the parties devote their energies to compiling information from which a reliable final
decision may be made following a trial on the merits.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...