ILNews

15 apply for Court of Appeals opening

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Six trial court judges, seven attorneys, one state senator, and the head of the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council are vying for a seat on the state's second-highest appellate court.

Fifteen applicants put their names in by the Thursday deadline for an Indiana Court of Appeals opening that is being created by Judge John T. Sharpnack's retirement in May.

The applicants are:

· William W. Barrett, Williams Hewitt Barrett & Wilkowski, Greenwood

· Hon. Elaine B. Brown, Dubois Superior Court

· Hon. Christopher L. Burnham, Morgan Superior Court 2

· Kit C. Dean Crane, Henry County prosecutor

· Hon. Jane Spencer Craney, Morgan Superior Court 3

· Richard R. Fox, Law Offices of Richard R. Fox, New Albany

· Stephen J. Johnson, executive director, Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council

· Jeffrey B. Kolb, Emison Doolittle Kolb & Roellgen, Vincennes

· Hon. Rebecca S. McClure, Boone Superior Court 2

· Daniel R. Miller, Evansville attorney

· William H. Mullis, Law Office of William H. Mullis, Mitchell

· Leslie C. Shively, Shively & Associates, Evansville

· Hon. P. Thomas Snow, Wayne Superior Court 1

· Sen. Brent E. Steele, Steele & Steele, Bedford

· Hon. G. Michael Witte, Dearborn Superior Court

Each will go before the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission for interviews, slated for Nov. 13. Those selected as semi-finalists will return Dec. 12 for a second round of questioning. From there, three names will be given to Gov. Mitch Daniels for consideration.

The person appointed will represent the Fifth District on the court, which means the person must live within the southern third of the state and faces statewide retention.

Judge Sharpnack's retirement will be the second judicial vacancy on the court in less than a year. Judge Patrick D. Sullivan retired in August, and the governor appointed former Marion Superior Judge Cale Bradford to that seat.

For more information about the Court of Appeals applicants, read the Nov. 14-27 issue of Indiana Lawyer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT