ILNews

2 Taft lawyers behind new ABA book

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

il-environmental-book01-1col.jpgenvironmental-factbox.gifThe idea for “Environmental Liability and Insurance Recovery” came to Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP attorneys Frank Deveau and David Guevara while waiting for another environmental-themed book they worked on to be published. In fact, the liability and recovery book, which came out in May, made it out a couple months before the other. Both were published by the American Bar Association.

That languishing book made them insistent that they could get the “Environmental Liability and Insurance Recovery” book out in one year. As editors, they could set the deadlines, hold authors accountable, and get the product to the publisher and printer on their timeline.

The two recognized the aggressive deadline, which they missed by only about six months.

Deveau and Guevara – who have worked with the ABA on other publishing projects – selected the authors to write chapters for this book. And they knew that Indiana has a wealth of knowledge in insurance coverage for environmental liability.

“Indiana has been a leader – right or wrong – in how the law has developed in the country” on insurance coverage for environmental matters, Deveau said. “We thought it’d be a great idea for a compilation of the law throughout the country on this topic.”
 

il-taft-book02-15col.jpg Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP lawyers Frank Deveau (far left) and David Guevara asked Taft attorney Tom O’Gara (right) and Kightlinger & Gray LLP lawyer Ginny Peterson to write chapters for their new book. (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

He noted that the firm has offices in Ohio, where the law is not as favorable as Indiana’s, and that state sees contaminated properties sit because there’s no insurance money for them. Indiana and states with laws favorable for insurance recovery are leading the country in terms of brownfield redevelopment, Deveau said.

Guevara said there really isn’t a book like “Environmental Liability and Insurance Recovery” that comprehensively addresses matters involving this area of practice. He hopes lawyers across the country will purchase it and use it as a reference.

Chapters include topics on Superfund liability, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and an insured’s response to environmental liability.

Deveau and Guevara asked attorneys in their office and lawyers around the country for suggestions as to whom should contribute to the book.

“We set our sights high regarding authors,” Guevara said. “We identified a set of what we considered preeminent environmental practitioners.”

Most of the attorneys contacted agreed to write for the book, including three Indianapolis attorneys – Tom O’Gara, of Taft; Ginny Peterson with Kightlinger & Gray LLP; and George Plews of Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP.

O’Gara wrote about common state statutory claims, such as illegal dumping and underground storage tanks. Plews’ chapter is on pollution exclusions in insurance policies, and Peterson wrote about the insurer’s response to an environmental liability claim.

Peterson broke out what she thought people would want to know about how insurance companies look at environmental matters and walks people through possible outcomes.

“I wanted people who may not typically practice in this area to also understand it,” she said.

With busy practices and family duties, the authors devoted certain times of the day or weekends to the project, they said. Peterson said she had to set aside a whole day or afternoon to write because it wasn’t something that you could work on for 15 minutes here or there. She estimated it took about four months for her to finish.

Plews said it took him just a couple of weeks to finish his chapter once he had time to focus on it. He’s very familiar with the pollution exclusion – he’s been practicing and litigating in that area for more than 20 years, he said.

The same time constraints for working on the book applied to Deveau and Guevara when it came to editing. Both spent late evenings and weekends working on the publication.

Because they were balancing the demands of their practice with the book, some authors needed to have their deadlines bumped back. Peterson asked for an extension and O’Gara said his needed moved a few times. With his fellow Taft attorneys as the editors, though, he knew exactly where everyone else was in the process and was able “to take advantage of that inside information,” he joked.

When asked why they would give up free time to work on a project like this, everyone said they did so because they learned something from it. The book allowed Peterson to combine her previous experience as a teacher and in the insurance industry with her legal experience. It also is a great tool for professional development.

“I learn from other people because those people have taken time, free of charge most of the time, to educate others,” she said. “I feel a need to do that. I like others to know I have this type of experience.”

“Quite frankly, it does become fun in the process,” Peterson said. “It makes you think about things outside of the case. I always learn in the process. I get as much from the process as I give.”

“I think whenever you sign up to do something like this, you learn something new about the law because it causes you to look at it in great detail and maybe in a fresh perspective because you’re not looking at it from one client’s perspective,” O’Gara said.


plews-george-mug.jpg Plews

Plews was quite happy to contribute to the book his knowledge on the pollution exclusion, which he described as a key topic.

“It’s a very important issue that was really near and dear to my heart,” he said. “I was pleased to contribute to a book which has a lot of other good chapters and distinguished folks from around the country on various topics related to environmental cost recovery.”

He enjoys writing and likes the chance to write outside of briefs. Writing book chapters like this allows him to step back and ask why an issue or policy is the way it is, he said, without the writing being tied to one particular case.

Even though the book is focused on environmental issues and insurance recovery, Plews thinks that it would be helpful to attorneys who practice outside of the environmental area because of the insurance and cost-recovery information.

Deveau and Guevara have heard positive feedback on the book. Guevara said he’s had inquiries from insurance companies for copies of the book and from attorneys who weren’t involved in the project asking how to get copies.

This is the first book that Peterson has worked on and she’d consider contributing to another. If she did, however, she’d begin to work on it earlier.

“It’s always crunch time. That’s how attorneys are though, we work under deadlines.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT