ILNews

7th Circuit: amendment applies to all mortgages

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A 2007 amendment allowing recorded mortgages with certain technical defects to provide constructive notice, as if the mortgages were properly recorded and acknowledged, applies to all mortgages regardless of when they were recorded, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday.

In what Circuit Judge Richard Cudahy described as "a puzzle of statutory interpretation," the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the U.S. District Court's reversal of the bankruptcy court ruling that held a 2007 amendment to Indiana's recording statute only applied to mortgages recorded after the amendment's effective date of July 1, 2007. A 2008 amendment added language that Indiana Code Section 32-21-4-1(c) applied regardless of when a mortgage was recorded, language that was missing in the 2007 amendment.

In dispute in the instant case is a mortgage provided by LaSalle Bank National Association's predecessor that was recorded in May 2001 but had a technical defect because it didn't identify the people who appeared before the notary and executed the mortgage document. After the debtors filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 13 in March 2008, trustee Debra Miller brought an adversary proceeding to avoid LaSalle's mortgage lien.

At issue in Debra L. Miller, trustee v. LaSalle Bank National Association, No. 09-3013, is whether before the 2008 amendment took effect, the 2007 amendment applied to purchasers of properties encumbered by certain technically deficient mortgages recorded prior to July 1, 2007.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals examined Indiana law on statutory interpretation and the language of the statute, and found the 2007 amendment to be ambiguous and not have a retroactive effect. It did agree with LaSalle that the relevant "retroactivity event" in this case is the attachment of the bona fide purchaser's rights.

"We do not agree with the Trustee that debtors had vested rights to the effect of technical defects at the time the mortgage was recorded. The rights of the bank and the debtors (here represented by the Trustee) vis-a-vis other creditors were determined at the time the Trustee's strong-arm powers arose," wrote Judge Cudahy. "The 2007 Amendment does change the rights of (bona fide purchasers) for purchases made after July 2007 - but that effect is clearly prospective."

Given the obvious ambiguity in the 2007 amendment and the apparent activity of the bankruptcy trustees in aggressively seeking to avoid mortgages on technical grounds even after that amendment, the 2008 amendment merely clarified the legislature's intent in 2007 that it was supposed to apply to all mortgages, whenever filed, the Circuit Court concluded.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  2. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

  3. @ Rebecca D Fell, I am very sorry for your loss. I think it gives the family solace and a bit of closure to go to a road side memorial. Those that oppose them probably did not experience the loss of a child or a loved one.

  4. If it were your child that died maybe you'd be more understanding. Most of us don't have graves to visit. My son was killed on a state road and I will be putting up a memorial where he died. It gives us a sense of peace to be at the location he took his last breath. Some people should be more understanding of that.

  5. Can we please take notice of the connection between the declining state of families across the United States and the RISE OF CPS INVOLVEMENT??? They call themselves "advocates" for "children's rights", however, statistics show those children whom are taken from, even NEGLIGENT homes are LESS likely to become successful, independent adults!!! Not to mention the undeniable lack of respect and lack of responsibility of the children being raised today vs the way we were raised 20 years ago, when families still existed. I was born in 1981 and I didn't even ever hear the term "CPS", in fact, I didn't even know they existed until about ten years ago... Now our children have disagreements between friends and they actually THREATEN EACH OTHER WITH, "I'll call CPS" or "I'll have [my parent] (usually singular) call CPS"!!!! And the truth is, no parent is perfect and we all have flaws and make mistakes, but it is RIGHTFULLY OURS - BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THIS GREAT NATION - to be imperfect. Let's take a good look at what kind of parenting those that are stealing our children are doing, what kind of adults are they producing? WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS TO THE CHILDREN THAT HAVE BEEN RIPPED FROM THEIR FAMILY AND THAT CHILD'S SUCCESS - or otherwise - AS AN ADULT.....

ADVERTISEMENT