ILNews

7th Circuit won't rehear prayer suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals won't rehear en banc Indiana's statehouse prayer suit.

An order came late Monday in Anthony Hinrichs, et al. v. Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Indiana General Assembly, No. 05-4604 and 05-4781, according to Ken Falk, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, who originally brought the suit almost three years ago.

Last fall, the ACLU had filed a rehearing petition on the heels of a 7th Circuit panel's decision Oct. 30 that plaintiffs didn't have standing to sue lawmakers about legislative prayer in May 2005.

The civil liberties organization had sued on behalf of four people objecting to the practice of opening each legislative session with a prayer. U.S. District Judge David F. Hamilton in Indianapolis had ruled the prayers couldn't mention the name Jesus Christ or any Christian terms because they amount to state endorsement of a religion. The court reversed that decision and ordered the federal suit be dismissed, but the ACLU asked for a rehearing en banc.

Falk said four judges - Judges Ann Claire Williams, Ilana Diamond Rovner, Diane P. Wood, and Terence T. Evans - voted in favor of rehearing the case. Not voting were Judges Joel Flaum and John D. Tinder; the latter just took the bench.

Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter said this decision backs up the state's position that legal precedent protects legislative prayer.

The ACLU has 90 days to decide whether to seek certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States, Falk said. A decision hasn't yet been made, but Falk said the organization is actively watching the current legislative session and could be ready to file another suit should lawmakers open with sectarian prayer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Oh my lordy Therapist Oniha of the winexbackspell@gmail.com I GOT Briggs BACK. Im so excited, It only took 2days for him to come home. bless divinity and bless god. i must be dreaming as i never thoughts he would be back to me after all this time. I am so much shock and just cant believe my eyes. thank you thank you thank you from the bottom of my heart,he always kiss and hug me now at all times,am so happy my heart is back to me with your help Therapist Oniha.

  2. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  3. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  4. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  5. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

ADVERTISEMENT