ILNews

Hickey: A change to E-pplaud

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Bar Association's President's Column:


Who says that hard work and persistence don't pay off? Well before the E-Trade talking baby commercials, our local judges were exerting their energy in formulating the framework of a plan to bring efficiencies to court filings. For those of you that have the pleasure of electronic filing in federal court or asbestos cases, you understand the benefits that come with the paperless push. Not so in the Marion Circuit and Superior Courts.

While federal court electronic filing has been around for well over a decade, our state courts have continued to withstand the deluge of legal filings and manual pushing of paper, nearly buckling under the mountain of it. As filings and caseloads have increased, so have the burdens beneath it. One must only look in the courtrooms to get a sense of the need for some E- innovation. It is, finally, here.

Through the concerted efforts of many of our jurists over many years, as well as the IT Director, Marion County Court Administrator and Clerk, the Marion County Circuit and Superior Courts Electronic Filing Pilot Project was approved by the Supreme Court, Division of State Court Administration, earlier this year. Local rules relating to electronic filing have been adopted and the Plan and Rules can be found at www.in.gov/judiciary/marion/docs/efiling021910.pdf.

Through this pilot project, E-filing will become a reality on May 17, 2010, for civil collections (CC) and mortgage foreclosure (MF) cases on a voluntary basis. LexisNexis is the third-party vendor who will bring to our local courts the File and Serve tested technology already being used in other courts throughout the country. Although the types of cases are initially limited, the hope is that the success of this program will lead to expansion in other areas, both substantively and geographically.

While some may look at change with trepidation, use of technology to improve the courts will in our lifetime be the legal standard across the nation. In addition to the "green-ness" of crawling out of the paper-age, there exist a whole host of other benefits that come with E-filing. Those were the subject of an article in the ABA Journal several years ago. Everything from improving efficiency and accessibility to cost-savings were cited as direct benefits of converting filings from paper to digital. Once over the initial "hump," E-filing is heralded as a money-saver in the long run. The article also highlights the added benefit of extended filing hours for procrastinating attorneys.

Without sounding like a commercial, the File and Serve site all but makes the case to opt-in for CC and MF cases. Benefits include: improving access to documents and maximizing resources; improving litigation support and gaining added control over case file management; filing and serving with greater ease; monitoring case activity with monitoring tools; and real time access to publicly-available court documents.

Of course, big change never comes without the discomfort of newness. A successful program starts with good training. With that, enter the Bar. The IBA E-Filing Task Force was created to assist in implementation of this project for the benefit of our members. In addition to recent Bar-hosted presentations on E-filing, training sessions in preparation for the project launch will be hosted at the IBA offices in early May. The sessions will be offered over several days and will include detailed demonstrations from LexisNexis representatives on the use of the File and Serve system. Look for additional information in upcoming issues of the E-Bulletin and special notices regarding reserving your spot.

That this project coming to fruition is something to celebrate is an understatement. It represents the hard work and dedication of persistent leaders in our legal community over many years. It is welcome change in the right direction.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The is an unsigned editorial masquerading as a news story. Almost everyone quoted was biased in favor of letting all illegal immigrants remain in the U.S. (Ignoring that Obama deported 3.5 million in 8 years). For some reason Obama enforcing part of the immigration laws was O.K. but Trump enforcing additional parts is terrible. I have listed to press conferences and explanations of the Homeland Security memos and I gather from them that less than 1 million will be targeted for deportation, the "dreamers" will be left alone and illegals arriving in the last two years -- especially those arriving very recently -- will be subject to deportation but after the criminals. This will not substantially affect the GDP negatively, especially as it will take place over a number of years. I personally think this is a rational approach to the illegal immigration problem. It may cause Congress to finally pass new immigration laws rationalizing the whole immigration situation.

  2. Mr. Straw, I hope you prevail in the fight. Please show us fellow American's that there is a way to fight the corrupted justice system and make them an example that you and others will not be treated unfairly. I hope you the best and good luck....

  3. @ President Snow - Nah, why try to fix something that ain't broken??? You do make an excellent point. I am sure some Mickey or Minnie Mouse will take Ruckers seat, I wonder how his retirement planning is coming along???

  4. Can someone please explain why Judge Barnes, Judge Mathias and Chief Judge Vaidik thought it was OK to re weigh the evidence blatantly knowing that by doing so was against the rules and went ahead and voted in favor of the father? I would love to ask them WHY??? I would also like to ask the three Supreme Justices why they thought it was OK too.

  5. How nice, on the day of my car accident on the way to work at the Indiana Supreme Court. Unlike the others, I did not steal any money or do ANYTHING unethical whatsoever. I am suing the Indiana Supreme Court and appealed the failure of the district court in SDIN to protect me. I am suing the federal judge because she failed to protect me and her abandonment of jurisdiction leaves her open to lawsuits because she stripped herself of immunity. I am a candidate for Indiana Supreme Court justice, and they imposed just enough sanction so that I am made ineligible. I am asking the 7th Circuit to remove all of them and appoint me as the new Chief Justice of Indiana. That's what they get for dishonoring my sacrifice and and violating the ADA in about 50 different ways.

ADVERTISEMENT