ILNews

Hickey: A change to E-pplaud

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Bar Association's President's Column:


Who says that hard work and persistence don't pay off? Well before the E-Trade talking baby commercials, our local judges were exerting their energy in formulating the framework of a plan to bring efficiencies to court filings. For those of you that have the pleasure of electronic filing in federal court or asbestos cases, you understand the benefits that come with the paperless push. Not so in the Marion Circuit and Superior Courts.

While federal court electronic filing has been around for well over a decade, our state courts have continued to withstand the deluge of legal filings and manual pushing of paper, nearly buckling under the mountain of it. As filings and caseloads have increased, so have the burdens beneath it. One must only look in the courtrooms to get a sense of the need for some E- innovation. It is, finally, here.

Through the concerted efforts of many of our jurists over many years, as well as the IT Director, Marion County Court Administrator and Clerk, the Marion County Circuit and Superior Courts Electronic Filing Pilot Project was approved by the Supreme Court, Division of State Court Administration, earlier this year. Local rules relating to electronic filing have been adopted and the Plan and Rules can be found at www.in.gov/judiciary/marion/docs/efiling021910.pdf.

Through this pilot project, E-filing will become a reality on May 17, 2010, for civil collections (CC) and mortgage foreclosure (MF) cases on a voluntary basis. LexisNexis is the third-party vendor who will bring to our local courts the File and Serve tested technology already being used in other courts throughout the country. Although the types of cases are initially limited, the hope is that the success of this program will lead to expansion in other areas, both substantively and geographically.

While some may look at change with trepidation, use of technology to improve the courts will in our lifetime be the legal standard across the nation. In addition to the "green-ness" of crawling out of the paper-age, there exist a whole host of other benefits that come with E-filing. Those were the subject of an article in the ABA Journal several years ago. Everything from improving efficiency and accessibility to cost-savings were cited as direct benefits of converting filings from paper to digital. Once over the initial "hump," E-filing is heralded as a money-saver in the long run. The article also highlights the added benefit of extended filing hours for procrastinating attorneys.

Without sounding like a commercial, the File and Serve site all but makes the case to opt-in for CC and MF cases. Benefits include: improving access to documents and maximizing resources; improving litigation support and gaining added control over case file management; filing and serving with greater ease; monitoring case activity with monitoring tools; and real time access to publicly-available court documents.

Of course, big change never comes without the discomfort of newness. A successful program starts with good training. With that, enter the Bar. The IBA E-Filing Task Force was created to assist in implementation of this project for the benefit of our members. In addition to recent Bar-hosted presentations on E-filing, training sessions in preparation for the project launch will be hosted at the IBA offices in early May. The sessions will be offered over several days and will include detailed demonstrations from LexisNexis representatives on the use of the File and Serve system. Look for additional information in upcoming issues of the E-Bulletin and special notices regarding reserving your spot.

That this project coming to fruition is something to celebrate is an understatement. It represents the hard work and dedication of persistent leaders in our legal community over many years. It is welcome change in the right direction.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT