A growing advantage to the law school degree

Marilyn Odendahl
November 4, 2015
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Well-documented changes in the legal profession since the economic recession are sending a small but growing number of law school graduates down a new career path toward companies that want employees with juris doctorates but do not involve the practice of law.

These types of positions, called J.D. advantage jobs, are mostly found in the business, financial and government sectors with the law school graduates working in human resources, contracts administration, investment services, higher education and law enforcement. Knowledge of the law coupled with the ability to understand legal documents and interpret statutes is seen as a benefit in these kinds of jobs.

Graduating from law school and not working as a lawyer may seem to be sad commentary on the current state of the legal profession but James Leipold, executive director of the National Association for Law Placement, said these jobs offer J.D. holders a good return on their investment.

The lawyers use their legal education without being strapped to their smartphones around the clock like their counterparts in big law. Also, the salary level is higher than some segments of traditional law practice.

“They are not terrible jobs,” Leipold said.

According to figures from the American Bar Association, 8.1 percent of the class of 2011 was employed in full-time, long-term J.D. advantage positions. Three years later, 11.2 percent of the class of 2014 had such jobs.

The number of students going into this type of employment remains very small compared to the overall number of law school graduates. In 2014, a total of 43,832 students earned their law degrees and just 6,360 went into J.D. advantage jobs.

Tatum Tatum

J.D. advantage jobs enable graduates to stay close to their dream jobs, said Kenny Tatum, assistant dean for career services at Indiana University Maurer School of Law. For example, graduates who want to practice corporate finance but do not find jobs at major law firms can still work in the field by doing compliance work at a financial institution.

Some graduates are taking J.D. advantage jobs as a plan B because they were unable to get a job practicing law, Tatum acknowledged.

Yet once they have the advantage jobs, the graduates may find more opportunity to take their career in different directions, he continued. They could move into other areas of the business, joining the legal department or filling executive positions. In fact, taking an entry-level job in a global company could provide more pathways to advancement than working in a three- to five-attorney firm.

‘Coveted’ knowledge

givens-nadine-mug.jpg Givens
In the past 2 1/2 years, PNC Wealth Management has hired a pair of graduates right out of law school and put them in J.D. advantage jobs.

Usually the new hires coming into the financial institution have backgrounds in economics or finance but, Nadine Givens, senior vice president and team director of PNC Wealth Management in Indianapolis, said the J.D. holders bring a different and much-needed understanding of the courts, the law and legal precedent.

She described their knowledge as “coveted.”

advantage-bars.gifThe bank is careful to set parameters on the work the non-practicing lawyers do. They do not draft legal documents nor are they to take the place of the client’s legal counsel. However, PNC does want its law school graduates to exercise their “J.D. muscle,” Givens said. They are called upon to review financial papers, wills and estate plans as well as advise clients of potential issues and collaborate with the private practice attorneys.

How PNC uses its law school graduates illustrates a typical J.D. advantage job. The ABA defines “J.D. advantage” as a position where a law degree is either required or provides a “demonstrable advantage” in doing the work but passing the bar or having a law license is not necessary.

Growth of government regulations and tech industry are fueling many of these types of jobs.

New financial regulations instituted after the economic downturn and health care regulations brought by the Affordable Care Act have created many jobs in compliance. Law school graduates are especially qualified to handle compliance issues because they can decipher statutes and determine how best to apply them, Tatum said.

In addition, the technology, like e-discovery, that is disrupting the legal profession is also generating J.D. advantage work. Leipold pointed out IT professionals alone cannot design computer programs to do the work of lawyers. Legal professionals are needed to guide the code writers.

Furthermore, the trend toward outsourcing routine legal tasks to foreign-based operations is providing other opportunities to law school graduates. The individuals supervising these operations have to have law degrees, Leipold said.

The market continues to change and the kinds of J.D. advantage jobs being created may be different in the coming years, but Tatum does not expect these positions will decrease even as law firms look to hire more associates each year.

“Unless the regulatory framework goes through significant changes or the legal-tech sector consolidates, I think these jobs are only going to grow,” Tatum said.

Career trajectory

The compensation for J.D. advantage jobs is a bright spot that also makes these positions attractive. Salaries are falling in between the two levels of pay typical for law school graduates, according to Leipold.

On the lower level, entry-level attorneys getting clerkships or taking associate positions in small- to mid-size firms are earning about $45,000 to $60,000 annually. Graduates hired by big law firms are at the upper level, taking home about $160,000 each year. J.D. advantage jobs are in the middle with pay ranging from $70,000 to $100,000.

What is not known is how satisfied lawyers are working in J.D. advantage jobs. Data shows a high percentage of employees in these positions say they are looking or intend to go to another job, Leipold said. The data does not indicate what kinds of jobs they are searching for but they could still want work where bar passage is required.

Jennifer Dempsey Fox is a licensed attorney who is very happy with her J.D. advantage job. With a background in accounting, she was working at Deloitte when she decided to enroll in the night division at Temple University Beasley School of Law.

Dempsey Fox is now the senior vice president and national managing director of wealth strategy for the PNC Asset Management Group in Pennsylvania. Currently, she does not rely on her legal knowledge as much but, she said, without her law school education she would not be in a leadership position.

dempsey-fox-jennifer-mug.jpg Dempsey Fox

Her studies of trusts, estates and tax law in law school made her better at accounting, Dempsey Fox said. She is able to view financial issues through a legal lens and give more sophisticated advice to her clients.

Still, when she was finishing law school in 1999, she considered pursuing a career in private practice. She asked attorneys for advice and considered her career trajectory. In the financial sector, she was already moving into management but switching careers to the law would have likely put her at the bottom as an associate.

“It wasn’t that I was turning away from private practice,” Dempsey Fox said. “It just seemed there were better opportunities for me outside of that.”•


  • puff piece
    This is ridiculous. Most JDs not practicing law don't know squat to justify calling themselves a lawyer. Maybe they should try visiting the inside of a courtroom before they go around calling themselves lawyers. This kind of promotional BS just increases the volume of people with JDs that are underqualified thereby dragging all the rest of us down likewise.
  • Hmmmm
    I have a degree at law, recent MS in regulatory studies. Licensed in KS, admitted b4 S& 7th circuit, but not to Indiana bar due to political correctness. Blacklisted, nearly unemployable due to hostile state action. Big Idea: Headwinds can overcome, esp for those not within the contours of the bell curve, the Lego Movie happiness set forth above. That said, even without the blacklisting for holding ideas unacceptable to the Glorious State, I think the idea presented above that a law degree open many vistas other than being a galley slave to elitist lawyers is pretty much laughable. (Did the law professors of Indiana pay for this to be published?)

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.