ABA approves paid externships for law students

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Law students will be able to earn money while earning class credit as part of a change to the legal education standards approved by the American Bar Association during its annual meeting this month.

The ABA House of Delegates concurred with a proposal from the ABA Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar which opens the door for law students to get academic credit for paid externships. According to a press release from the ABA, the delegates voted Aug. 8 on the proposal after a “short but spirited debate.”

Under the previous standard, students were barred from receiving compensation for field placements. In August 2014, the House of Delegates nudged the council to remove the prohibition. The delegates said eliminating the provision would increase the number of experiential opportunities and enable law students to graduate with less debt.

In December 2015, the council approved amendments to the Standards for Approval of Law Schools which followed the delegates’ recommendation and crossed out the prohibition on paychecks. Advocates of the change echoed the delegates, saying students would be able to reduce their loan debt if they could earn money while getting class credit.

However some law school professors opposed the removal. They fear that allowing compensation will alter the nature of the externship to one where employers are assigning work that benefits the organization rather than work that helps the students’ educational growth.

In its report on the proposal, the council said it did share the professors’ concern. It stated the protections in the revised standard “were adequate to ensure that students participating in field placements for which compensation is offered would be receiving a substantial lawyering experience deserving of academic credit.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful -