ILNews

ABA releases tool to assess cognitive impairment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Working in a profession that prizes intellectual agility, lawyers can be especially sensitive to questions about their mental faculties.

Legal professionals tend to tie their sense of self to their cognitive function. They think of themselves as being well-educated problem-solvers who are trained to help others. Above all, they value intellectual stimulation.

However, the stressful sedentary lifestyle that typically accompanies a career in the law also puts lawyers at risk for cognitive impairment. And while lawyers can be hurt when someone points out they have packed on a few pounds, they can be devastated when a colleague tells them they are not fully comprehending their cases or their advice to clients is problematic.

To help attorneys who are concerned about the intellectual fitness of another lawyer or judge, the American Bar Association has recently released a cognitive assessment tool. In 2008, the ABA’s Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs created what became the Senior Lawyer Committee, the group that led the work on developing the assessment instrument.

The “Working Paper on Cognitive Impairment and Cognitive Decline” is a questionnaire designed to give attorneys guidance in determining whether a partner or friend is just having a bad month or is suffering from something more serious. It also provides recommendations for talking to a colleague who is exhibiting troublesome behavior.
 

Terry Harrell mug Harrell

“This is not a diagnostic tool,” explained Terry Harrell, executive director of the Indiana Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. “It’s a tool to determine 

if you need to ask someone to have an evaluation” by a medical doctor.

Harrell assisted in the development of the cognitive questionnaire when she served as co-chair of the ABA CoLAP Senior Lawyer Committee. She will become chair of the ABA Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs in August.
 

The assessment tool was created in response to the rise in calls to lawyer assistance programs across the country from attorneys concerned about colleagues’ cognitive fumbles.

Harrell noted inquires about mental acuity remain a small percentage of the calls that assistance programs receive. Problems with depression and substance abuse far outpace cognitive impairments, but concerns about intellectual health are the fastest-growing segment of all calls.

Across the United States, lawyer assistance programs reported a 14-percent increase in cognitive inquires between 2010 and 2012, Harrell said.

Normal aging or a symptom?

Tip-of-the-tongue moments become more common as people age. The instances where someone’s name does not quickly come to mind or having to look a little longer for the car keys are the kinds of things that naturally happen when someone gets older.

Even as their mental abilities slow, people can still remain active and do their jobs very well, said Dr. Ann Marie Hake, associate professor of clinical neurology at Indiana University School of Medicine. The problem arises when those tip-of-the-tongue moments become more persistent and more frequent that they interfere with normal activities.

hake-ann Hake

Not recognizing family members, substituting the wrong word, getting lost near home and dramatic personality changes are possible signs of cognitive 

impairment, Harrell said.

The ABA’s cognitive assessment tool gives a picture of what is happening by having concerned colleagues put their observations on paper. Writing down any shortcomings in job performance along with changes in appearance or behavior, Harrell said, enables attorneys to better see how their partners and associates are functioning at the office.

Cognitive decline is not limited to senior citizens. Medical conditions, such as diabetes; prescription drugs; emotional turmoil caused by family troubles or even lack of sleep can interfere with the efficient function of a young or middle-aged lawyer’s brain.

Not the end of a career

Certainly, the practice of law can overwork a brain. Attorneys cannot control the pace of the work, so maybe one month they have multiple hearings and briefings to prepare which forces them to forgo sleep and a healthy diet while the next month, the list of things to do shrinks considerably.

“Part of the wear and tear of being a lawyer is that you have a variety of intense things to do that come on a regular, irregular basis,” said Jim Roth, chair of the Indiana State Bar Association Senior Lawyers Section.

Ironically, Hake said, while certain parts of practicing law can put attorneys at risk for cognitive impairment, other parts can diminish that risk.

Sitting all day, working in a high-pressure environment is not good for either the body or the brain, she said. But the high level of education attorneys have plus the amount of intellectual stimulation they get during the day actually exercises the brain in a good way.

Still, Roth questioned when slowing down cognitively becomes an impairment.

“What’s a problem?” he asked. “If you’re at 90-percent capacity of what you used to be, is that a problem?”

He then voiced what is likely a common fear of being told to quit practicing law rather than being allowed to continue doing what you love. He proposed instituting some type of mentor program that can help older attorneys do their work as lawyers. Someone to assist with the workload or to bounce ideas off can provide the needed boost to enable an attorney to keep serving clients.cognitive-facts.jpg
Hake agreed, saying she is not an advocate of retirement. With individuals who do suffer from degenerative dementia, the cognitive decline is usually gradual and with the proper medication and support, they can still contribute.

“These guys and gals have a lot of experience and a lot of knowledge,” Hake said. “Why put that to waste?”

Having a conversation

Doing the assessment is not easy. First the concerned attorney must identify the best people to speak with about the worrisome colleague. Ideally, it should be people who work closely with the colleague and care enough about him or her to be honest in their observations, Harrell said.

Second, the concerned attorney must have a conversation with the colleague.

Mike Long, attorney counselor with the Oregon Attorney Assistance Program, conceded talking to another attorney about his or her mental decline can be tremendously uncomfortable. Compounding the situation is that lawyers usually do not have any experience talking about cognitive problems, and questions about intellect can feel like a personal attack.

Long, who has counseled attorneys for more than 20 years, played a key role in developing the ABA cognitive assessment tool.

Although talking with a lawyer who shows signs of cognitive impairment is difficult, Long pointed out ignoring the problem can have severe consequences. Clients can be hurt, the law firm could get slapped with a malpractice lawsuit and ethical issues could sprout. All this could lead to the impaired attorney, who was once a well-respected member of the legal community, having his or her career ended by a disciplinary action.

Long advised the conversation should be objective and detail what behaviors and work habits have been observed that are causing concerns. Attorneys should be specific with the colleague, noting situations, for example, where appointments were forgotten or court dates missed. Speculation and hearsay should be avoided.

The ABA working paper drew praise from Hake who said the committee did a good job describing the signs and symptoms of possible impairment.

She also encouraged attorneys to be proactive and address any problems rather than dismissing them. The cause of a cognitive impairment might be reversible, but it should be addressed early otherwise it might cause permanent damage. And, if the cause is not reversible, attorneys can take steps to protect their clients and preserve their reputations.

“People shouldn’t be afraid to get checked out and help others get checked out,” Hake said.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hope my money didn't fund that!
    If real money was spent on this study, what a shame. And if some air-head professor tries to use this to advance a career, pity the poor student. I am approaching a time that i (and others around me) should be vigilant. I don't think I'm anywhere near there yet, but seeing the subject I was looking forward to something I might use to look for some benchmarks. When finally finding my way to the hidden questionnaire all I could say to myself was...what a joke. Those are open and obvious signs of any impaired lawyer (or non-lawyer, for that matter), And if one needs a checklist to discern those tell-tale signs of impairment at any age, one shouldn't be practicing law. Another reason I don't regret dropping my ABA membership some number of years ago.
  • hmmmm
    I work with some older lawyers in the 70s, 80s, and they are sharp as tacks compared to the foggy minded, undisciplined, inexperienced, listless & aimless "youths" being churned out by the diploma mill law schools by the tens of thousands. A client is generally lucky to land a lawyer who has decided to stay in practice a long time. Young people shouldn't kid themselves. Experience is golden especially in something like law. When you start out as a new lawyer you are about as powerful as a babe in the cradle. Whereas the silver halo of age usually crowns someone who can strike like thunder.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

  2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

  3. Low energy. Next!

  4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

  5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

ADVERTISEMENT