ILNews

Abrams: We Will Provide Value And Be Meaningful

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

abrams-jeff-indybarI am embarking on the presidency of the Indianapolis Bar Association. I see my role as the manager of a phenomenal team willing to sacrifice their time to serve others and provide unique benefits to the public. It is my role to be sure that our outstanding staff at the IndyBar consisting of Julie, Kari, Mary Kay, Chris, Tara, Ashley, Caren, Natalie, Stephanie and Tabitha help you in your careers and implement the programs we have decided to provide the public. I was once told that you do not have to be the smartest person in the room, just be sure you surround yourself with smarter people. I have done that. The officers and board of directors of the Indianapolis Bar Association and chairs of the sections, committees, divisions and task forces will help me successfully achieve our goals for 2014.

Bar associations all over the country are changing and evolving. Many of them are slow to make changes and improve the services that they provide to its members. We have been at the forefront of embracing change and welcoming new and creative programs for the benefit of our members. The Indy Attorneys Network Section is a good example.

A couple of years ago, two young intellectual property/patent attorneys wanted to meet more Indianapolis lawyers since their scope of practice limited the attorneys they met. They brainstormed with other attorneys to determine that there was a need being underserved with our bar association. They put together a proposal to the Executive Committee of the IndyBar, which was overwhelmingly supported in its presentation to the board of directors. The board also saw the creativity and genius behind this new section to provide Indianapolis attorneys with an opportunity to meet other attorneys to help them grow individually, socially and professionally.

This section currently has in excess of 175 attorneys. Each attorney receives an email each month introducing them to another member of the section and encouraging them to meet. They have also had a couple events for the entire section where speakers were brought in a social setting to advance the personal growth of each of these attorneys. We are unaware of any other bar association that had this type of section or program, and its membership total after just its first full year is impressive.

I remember when I was first asked to get involved with the Indianapolis Bar Foundation. I spent almost 25 years being a member of the IndyBar but participated in very few events. I always saw the organization primarily as a resource for litigators and the court system. I am a commercial real estate attorney, not a litigator.

Within the first couple of years of serving on the board of the IBF, a fellow officer referred me a case that was only partially related to real estate but primarily a litigation matter. He knew I would not be primarily involved in the case, but he trusted me to be sure the client was well taken care of.

Our firm received in excess of $100,000 in legal fees all as a result of my involvement with the IBF and getting to know this attorney. I was forever grateful for the opportunity to have gotten to know this attorney better and for him to have referred this case to me, which I never would have seen had I not been involved. I hear other stories like this from many attorneys including those with whom I have sent cases and work as a result of their participation with the IBF and the IndyBar.

I have also gotten to know hundreds of attorneys, primarily in the litigation world, that I never would have gotten to know but for my involvement with the IBF and the IndyBar. I can honestly say that my life has been enriched by meeting these people and calling them friends. I do not know how anyone else could see it any other way if you get involved with the IndyBar and meet other lawyers.

We will endeavor to provide additional services and benefits for the members of the IndyBar so that each of you, if not currently members, will consider joining in 2014 and give us an opportunity to show that there is real value in being part of the IndyBar. Give us a chance. I know that we can make a difference for each of you and for the community that we serve.

One of my mentors enjoyed writing poetry for special occasions to express his thoughts. I have enjoyed honoring him by trying to provide some humorous and thoughtful prose that just happens to rhyme. So one unique aspect of my column will be for it to end with a poem.

It is my honor to serve as the president of the IndyBar.

If we have not yet met, I hope our paths cross and we meet someday.
Join the IndyBar and give us a chance to provide value during your working day.
I know we can be successful in helping you be a rising star and not lead you astray.
The IndyBar is here for you in everything that you may do.
So that the senior partner or employer gives you a glowing annual review!

HAPPY NEW YEAR!•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I don't agree that this is an extreme case. There are more of these people than you realize - people that are vindictive and/or with psychological issues have clogged the system with baseless suits that are costly to the defendant and to taxpayers. Restricting repeat offenders from further abusing the system is not akin to restricting their freedon, but to protecting their victims, and the court system, from allowing them unfettered access. From the Supreme Court opinion "he has burdened the opposing party and the courts of this state at every level with massive, confusing, disorganized, defective, repetitive, and often meritless filings."

  2. So, if you cry wolf one too many times courts may "restrict" your ability to pursue legal action? Also, why is document production equated with wealth? Anyone can "produce probably tens of thousands of pages of filings" if they have a public library card. I understand this is an extreme case, but our Supreme Court really got this one wrong.

  3. He called our nation a nation of cowards because we didn't want to talk about race. That was a cheap shot coming from the top cop. The man who decides who gets the federal government indicts. Wow. Not a gentleman if that is the measure. More importantly, this insult delivered as we all understand, to white people-- without him or anybody needing to explain that is precisely what he meant-- but this is an insult to timid white persons who fear the government and don't want to say anything about race for fear of being accused a racist. With all the legal heat that can come down on somebody if they say something which can be construed by a prosecutor like Mr Holder as racist, is it any wonder white people-- that's who he meant obviously-- is there any surprise that white people don't want to talk about race? And as lawyers we have even less freedom lest our remarks be considered violations of the rules. Mr Holder also demonstrated his bias by publically visiting with the family of the young man who was killed by a police offering in the line of duty, which was a very strong indicator of bias agains the offer who is under investigation, and was a failure to lead properly by letting his investigators do their job without him predetermining the proper outcome. He also has potentially biased the jury pool. All in all this worsens race relations by feeding into the perception shared by whites as well as blacks that justice will not be impartial. I will say this much, I do not blame Obama for all of HOlder's missteps. Obama has done a lot of things to stay above the fray and try and be a leader for all Americans. Maybe he should have reigned Holder in some but Obama's got his hands full with other problelms. Oh did I mention HOlder is a bank crony who will probably get a job in a silkstocking law firm working for millions of bucks a year defending bankers whom he didn't have the integrity or courage to hold to account for their acts of fraud on the United States, other financial institutions, and the people. His tenure will be regarded by history as a failure of leadership at one of the most important jobs in our nation. Finally and most importantly besides him insulting the public and letting off the big financial cheats, he has been at the forefront of over-prosecuting the secrecy laws to punish whistleblowers and chill free speech. What has Holder done to vindicate the rights of privacy of the American public against the illegal snooping of the NSA? He could have charged NSA personnel with violations of law for their warrantless wiretapping which has been done millions of times and instead he did not persecute a single soul. That is a defalcation of historical proportions and it signals to the public that the government DOJ under him was not willing to do a damn thing to protect the public against the rapid growth of the illegal surveillance state. Who else could have done this? Nobody. And for that omission Obama deserves the blame too. Here were are sliding into a police state and Eric Holder made it go all the faster.

  4. JOE CLAYPOOL candidate for Superior Court in Harrison County - Indiana This candidate is misleading voters to think he is a Judge by putting Elect Judge Joe Claypool on his campaign literature. paragraphs 2 and 9 below clearly indicate this injustice to voting public to gain employment. What can we do? Indiana Code - Section 35-43-5-3: Deception (a) A person who: (1) being an officer, manager, or other person participating in the direction of a credit institution, knowingly or intentionally receives or permits the receipt of a deposit or other investment, knowing that the institution is insolvent; (2) knowingly or intentionally makes a false or misleading written statement with intent to obtain property, employment, or an educational opportunity; (3) misapplies entrusted property, property of a governmental entity, or property of a credit institution in a manner that the person knows is unlawful or that the person knows involves substantial risk of loss or detriment to either the owner of the property or to a person for whose benefit the property was entrusted; (4) knowingly or intentionally, in the regular course of business, either: (A) uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure or other device for falsely determining or recording the quality or quantity of any commodity; or (B) sells, offers, or displays for sale or delivers less than the represented quality or quantity of any commodity; (5) with intent to defraud another person furnishing electricity, gas, water, telecommunication, or any other utility service, avoids a lawful charge for that service by scheme or device or by tampering with facilities or equipment of the person furnishing the service; (6) with intent to defraud, misrepresents the identity of the person or another person or the identity or quality of property; (7) with intent to defraud an owner of a coin machine, deposits a slug in that machine; (8) with intent to enable the person or another person to deposit a slug in a coin machine, makes, possesses, or disposes of a slug; (9) disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading, or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of employment;

  5. The story that you have shared is quite interesting and also the information is very helpful. Thanks for sharing the article. For more info: http://www.treasurecoastbailbonds.com/

ADVERTISEMENT