Adult guardians sworn in

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Rehearing

A swearing-in ceremony for the first class of the Wishard Volunteer Advocates Program took place Oct. 18 at Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis.

The program, which provides volunteers who have been trained to be guardians for ill and at-risk adults and seniors at Wishard Hospital in Indianapolis, is modeled after the Volunteer Advocates for Seniors Program at Saint Margaret Mercy Healthcare Centers in Northwest Indiana in partnership with the Lake Superior Courts.

The advocates have been trained to work with adults with a range of issues, including elderly adults with dementia or other mental health concerns, adults of all ages with developmental disabilities, and others who cannot speak for themselves and likely don’t have a trusted relative who can speak for them on important decisions regarding their medical care and other day-to-day needs they might have.

“Our volunteers are trained, court-appointed advocates who protect the interests of the patients they serve both while the patients are in the hospital and after they have been transitioned to healthcare facilities or the community,” Robin Bandy, director of the Wishard Volunteer Advocates Program, said in a statement.

Similar to Court Appointed Special Advocates and Guardians Ad Litem for children, as guardians and advocates for adults, the volunteers will work closely with those to whom they have been assigned, while giving them a voice in court when needed.

“As a physician, I often care for adults who are unable to make their own decisions due to conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, head trauma or other related illnesses,” Dr. Alexia Torke, a physician at Wishard Health Services and an assistant professor of medicine in the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics at the IU School of Medicine, said in a statement.

“Sometimes these folks have no one to look out for them. They desperately need a caring, responsible individual to help them make medical decisions, find a safe place to live, and keep others in the community from abusing them,” she added.

The Wishard Volunteer Advocates Program is currently recruiting additional volunteer advocates and is also accepting monetary and clothing donations for patients needing personal care items. Anyone interested and who would like further information regarding the program can contact the program director at (317) 630-6254.

Adult guardianship programs around the state that are affiliated with the Indiana Adult Guardianship Services Project are also looking for volunteers of all backgrounds. Becky Pryor, project coordinator of the statewide program, can be reached via her e-mail,, for information.

Rehearing "Addressing a statewide concern" IL Sept. 1-14, 2010


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Lori, you must really love wedding cake stories like this one ... happy enuf ending for you?

  2. This new language about a warning has not been discussed at previous meetings. It's not available online. Since it must be made public knowledge before the vote, does anyone know exactly what it says? Further, this proposal was held up for 5 weeks because members Carol and Lucy insisted that all terms used be defined. So now, definitions are unnecessary and have not been inserted? Beyond these requirements, what is the logic behind giving one free pass to discriminators? Is that how laws work - break it once and that's ok? Just don't do it again? Three members of Carmel's council have done just about everything they can think of to prohibit an anti-discrimination ordinance in Carmel, much to Brainard's consternation, I'm told. These three 'want to be so careful' that they have failed to do what at least 13 other communities, including Martinsville, have already done. It's not being careful. It's standing in the way of what 60% of Carmel residents want. It's hurting CArmel in thT businesses have refused to locate because the council has not gotten with the program. And now they want to give discriminatory one free shot to do so. Unacceptable. Once three members leave the council because they lost their races, the Carmel council will have unanimous approval of the ordinance as originally drafted, not with a one free shot to discriminate freebie. That happens in January 2016. Why give a freebie when all we have to do is wait 3 months and get an ordinance with teeth from Day 1? If nothing else, can you please get s copy from Carmel and post it so we can see what else has changed in the proposal?

  3. Here is an interesting 2012 law review article for any who wish to dive deeper into this subject matter: Excerpt: "Judicial interpretation of the ADA has extended public entity liability to licensing agencies in the licensure and certification of attorneys.49 State bar examiners have the authority to conduct fitness investigations for the purpose of determining whether an applicant is a direct threat to the public.50 A “direct threat” is defined as “a significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by a modification of policies, practices or procedures, or by the provision of auxiliary aids or services as provided by § 35.139.”51 However, bar examiners may not utilize generalizations or stereotypes about the applicant’s disability in concluding that an applicant is a direct threat.52"

  4. We have been on the waiting list since 2009, i was notified almost 4 months ago that we were going to start receiving payments and we still have received nothing. Every time I call I'm told I just have to wait it's in the lawyers hands. Is everyone else still waiting?

  5. I hope you dont mind but to answer my question. What amendment does this case pretain to?