ILNews

Aerial Attorneys

Emily Hinkel
September 11, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Twelve thousand feet above rolling Indiana farmland, attorney Amy Romig prepares to jump, as the saying goes, out of a perfectly good airplane. Most of the plane’s passengers are jittery first-time skydivers, but Romig’s nerves are just fine. That’s because she’s done this 1,300 times.

Dressed in a flight suit and armed with three separate altimeters, she looks exactly what she is: experienced, calm, and careful. She puts on her helmet and jumps, almost casually, out of the plane. She’s gone in an instant. A first-time skydiver in the cabin screams in alarm when Romig exits the plane, but Romig doesn’t hear her. She’s already rocketing toward the ground, the wind roaring in her ears, tearing through the sky at 120 miles per hour.
 

skydive-15col.jpg Plews Shadley attorney Amy Romig has made more than 1,300 jumps. (Photo/ Todd Morman)

Romig, a partner at Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP, just celebrated her nine-year “sky-versary,” as she has affectionately dubbed it. Initially wanting only to check an item off of her bucket list, she never suspected that skydiving would quickly become her passion.

If skydiver doesn’t fit your image of the typical lawyer, think again. The average drop zone is a huge melting pot, full of individuals from many walks of life. A chiropractor, an engineer, a mechanic, several musicians, and — of course — an attorney are all present on this jump day.

Romig posits that the personalities attracted to law and skydiving actually overlap.

“One thing that lawyers do is make sure that they’re well prepared,” she explained. “They come up with strategies, they prioritize and think out the risks, and skydiving is a lot the same way. You make sure you’re adequately prepared, and you plan exactly what you’re going to do. It’s very similar to when we prepare for hearings in that you think about what might possibly happen and prepare for all eventualities.”


romig Romig

Romig is not the only attorney at Plews Shadley Racher & Braun who has taken the leap. Eight associates have tried it, often at the encouragement of Romig, and her very first dive was with two of her colleagues.

Brett Nelson, one of the two attorneys who jumped with Romig on their maiden flight, had — and still does have — a fear of heights. In fact, a desire to overcome that fear was one of the main reasons he went skydiving in the first place. Though he has never been able to totally conquer his fears, they aren’t enough to safeguard him against the allure of skydiving.

“Absolutely, when I hit the ground, I knew,” Nelson said. “Nothing had ever been that fun and exciting for me, and I knew I’d do it again. Of course, those first four or five seconds before I went out the [airplane] door, I was equally sure that I’d never, ever do it again.”

Despite his fear, Nelson has jumped over 800 times.


nelson-brett Nelson

Romig, on the other hand, doesn’t recall being scared at all on her first jump. She was too focused on completing each step of the dive correctly to have time for jangling nerves. Any pre-jump jitters she may have felt were alleviated by the thorough organization and day-long training provided by Skydive Greensburg, now Skydive Indianapolis.

“I felt completely confident,” she said. “They trained us so well, and you’re a lot less scared when you know what’s coming and you’re fully prepared.”

One thing attorneys who have made this leap of faith agree on is that skydiving is the ultimate way to relieve stress and escape the grind of daily life.

“It’s absolutely wonderful,” Romig said. “For that minute that I’m in freefall, all I’m thinking about is what I have to do during that minute in freefall. I don’t think about work. I don’t think about whether I’m going to be late for daycare. I don’t think about whether I’ve changed the oil in my car. I’m purely focused on what I am doing for that minute. I can’t think of any other activity I do that does that for me.”

But Romig is quick to clarify that skydiving is much more than just a thrill. Calling it 90 percent mental and 10 percent physical, Romig notes that skydiving is a very technical and disciplined sport. That, along with its ability to always provide new goals and challenges, is what appeals to her.

“I was going to be an engineer,” she said, “but I got bored and decided I didn’t want to turn the same valve for the next 20 years. I chose law because things were new and exciting and I always had a challenge, and skydiving is the same way.” Even after 1,300 jumps, she claims she still learns something new every time.

Having mastered the basics, Romig quickly moved on to competitive skydiving. Each year, she attends the USPA National Skydiving Championships, where she competes on an eight-person team to determine which team can complete the most formations during freefall within a set time limit. This two-week event not only satisfies Romig’s competitive streak, but also provides a real sense of community.

“It’s really rare for your rec league basketball player from NIFS to get to play on the same court as LeBron James, but I get to do that,” she said. “I get to see the best skydivers in the world, and they’ll talk to me and help coach our team and give us suggestions. It’s a very small community, and it’s very collegial.”

Romig’s eight-way competition is just one event of many. There are a surprising variety of disciplines within skydiving, including one in which acrobatics are performed mid-air, and another in which divers deploy their parachutes almost immediately and demonstrate their canopy skills.

“Some people like the canopy part so much that that’s all they do,” Romig explains. She pauses slightly, then smiles. “Obviously you can’t do just the freefall part.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT