After heartbreak, tech startup maintains focus on case management software

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There were a lot of lightning bolts that led to the start of the legal technology company Case Pacer.

casepacer-4-forweb-15col.jpg Case Pacer executives Laura Williams and Dan Carroll are expecting the legal tech startup to double in size within the next year. (IL photo/Eric Learned)

The software, which has a heavy dose of artificial intelligence; the financing mechanism that funneled the cash to launch the business; and the pricing method that made the product affordable to plaintiff attorneys, were all sparks of inspiration.

But the lightning bolt that came in November 2016 was unexpected and devastating. Kevin McCarthy, the visionary and energy behind Case Pacer, was killed in an auto accident along with sales representative Casey Speckman.

McCarthy built the company, knew the customers and had a clear picture of what the business needed to do to continue growing. The blueprints for the future were all in his head and when he was gone, no one person at Case Pacer had the complete master plan.

However, the vision was spread among the employees, said investor Gary Brackett, the retired Indianapolis Colts linebacker, now a restaurateur and entrepreneur. Each worker understood their area of the company, whether sales, technology or financing, and together they could recreate the roadmap.

“While it’s hard to replace a Kevin McCarthy, we all pieced together all of our knowledge that we had,” Brackett said. “We’re really working together with everyone getting on the same page and creating a new vision in Kevin’s legacy.”

Today Case Pacer is moving forward. It and its sister company, Express Medical Records, have 25 employees, including software developers and sales representatives, and Case Pacer has a customer base of about 70 law firms around the country. Revenue for both companies in 2016 came in slightly north of $2 million, according to Interim CEO Dan Carroll.

“Kevin was a special person and this is a special company,” Carroll said. “We need to put on the track shoes and run like hell because we are in great situation and we have to take advantage of that to fulfill Kevin’s vision and legacy in the process.”

Customizing and ticklers

casepacer-5-15col.jpg The software offers a cloud-based management system specifically designed for trial lawyers. (IL photo/Eric Learned)

Case Pacer, launched in 2013, is a case management system specifically geared for plaintiff attorneys. The seed that grew into the company was actually planted by Carmel personal injury lawyer Vaughn Wamsley, who developed the underlying intelligence of the software and obtained two patents in the process.

Two key features of the technology are the ability for attorneys to customize the program and the tickler system. Both enable lawyers to keep track of the progress of their cases, know what their employees are working on, and see what steps need to be taken next.

Law firms can design Case Pacer to follow the procedure they take when prosecuting a personal injury, medical malpractice or workers’ compensation claim. A firm that first gets the medical records then moves to the deposition of medical experts, and another firm that prefers to start with the accident report, can each have the software molded to fit their unique workflow.

“What Kevin was very right about was saying he didn’t want to create software that forced law firms to practice law the way he felt it should be done,” Carroll said. “(Case Pacer is) ultimately customizable.”

Once the attorney begins using the software, reminders, or what Case Pacer calls “ticklers,” will appear identifying what steps need to be taken to keep the case moving. The tickler system does have an artificial intelligence component. If an attorney combines two steps or the case moves in such a manner that certain steps can be skipped, the system adjusts and points to the next appropriate step.

Fort Wayne trial lawyer Roger Finderson credits Case Pacer with helping him sleep at night. When he wakes up and begins worrying about a case, he can grab his smartphone, log on to the software, double-check whatever is bothering him, then relax.

“I sleep so much better,” the solo practitioner said.

Finderson began using Case Pacer when he opened his office April 1, 2014. He had become friends with McCarthy and, being a computer programmer at heart, saw how the software could benefit his practice.

Relying on referrals, Finderson knew he had to be able to take the clients that were sent to him. Turning people down because he did not have the time to handle their cases could have eventually stopped referrals from coming. Instead, he said Case Pacer has allowed him to keep a heavy workload, estimating the software has enabled him to boost his caseload by 25 percent without having to hire another attorney.

And just like he can do at night, whenever a client or opposing counsel calls, he can quickly access the case file and see what has been done as well as what needs to be done next.

“It does send the message that you can think what you will of me but at least I know what I’m doing,” Finderson said.

Value proposition

Brackett was an early financial backer of Case Pacer, immediately seeing the value of the technology. He and his five siblings had filed a medical malpractice lawsuit after his mother died, and from that experience, he remembered how the process can exhaust and financially strain clients.

As plaintiffs’ cases trudge along, bills can pile up and mortgages go unpaid. Lot of clients need money immediately so getting the restitution potentially six months faster for a nominal cost, Brackett said, would be a “no brainer.”

“That ability to streamline the process was really appealing to me,” Brackett said. “I really thought it was a viable product just because what I went through in the process, and I understood what it meant to have that case close sooner.”

From the beginning, Carroll said, McCarthy realized developing the Case Pacer software would take years and lots of money. So he first created and launched Express Medical Records, which is a medical records retrieval service helping trial lawyers get the physician and treatment information they need for the clients’ cases.

The revenue generated from Express was used, in part, to support the work on the case management program. Just as importantly, by introducing the medical records program to law firms, McCarthy was able to build relationships with attorneys, which later led to sales of Case Pacer.

Introducing the software to law firms and getting them excited about the capabilities were not difficult, but setting the price was. Carroll said he and McCarthy struggled with how to get firms to, literally, buy in. McCarthy hit upon the solution.

Case Pacer devised a payment mechanism whereby law firms get the software for free and the costs are shifted to the attorneys’ clients as a modest user fee of $150 for two years of document storage. Once the case is finished and the settlement check is in hand, then the Case Pacer charge is added to the list of other fees that are paid by the plaintiff, such as the costs for filing and depositions.

Laura Williams, Case Pacer director of operations and client relations, said most firms do not believe the offer initially. Often they follow up the conversation by asking her to send a billing agreement so they can read the terms for themselves.

“I think they think we’re going to change our minds,” Williams said, laughing.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  2. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

  3. We are a Finance Industry Company professionals with over 15 Years Experience and a focus on providing Bank Guarantee and Standby Letter of Credit from some of the World Top 25 Prime Banks primarily from Barclays, Deutsche Bank, HSBC,Credit Suisse e.t.c. FEATURES: Amounts from $1 million to 5 Billion+ Euro’s or US Dollars Great Attorney Trust Account Protection Delivered via MT760, MT799 and MT103 Swift with Full Bank Responsibility Brokers Always Protected Purchase Instrument of BG/SBLC : 32%+2% Min Face Value cut = EUR/USD 1M-5B Lease Instrument of BG/SBLC : 4%+2% Min Face Value cut = EUR/USD 1M-5B Interested Agents/Brokers, Investors and Individual proposing international project funding should contact us for directives.We will be glad to share our working procedures with you upon request. We Facilitate Bank instruments SBLC for Lease and Purchase. Whether you are a new startup, medium or large establishment that needs a financial solution to fund/get your project off the ground or business looking for extra capital to expand your operation,our company renders credible and trusted bank guarantee provider who are willing to fund and give financing solutions that suits your specific business needs. We help you secure and issue sblc and bank guarantee for your trade, projects and investment from top AA rated world Banks like HSBC, Barclays, Dutch Ing Bank, Llyods e.t.c because that’s the best and safest strategy for our clients.e.t.c DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENTS 1. Instrument: Funds backed Bank Guarantee(BG) ICC-600 2. Currency : USD/EURO 3. Age of Issue: Fresh Cut 4. Term: One year and One day 5. Contract Amount: United State Dollars/Euros (Buyers Face Value) 6. Price : Buy:32%+1, Lease: 4%+2 7. Subsequent tranches: To be mutually agreed between both parties 8. Issuing Bank: Top RATED world banks like HSBC, Barclays, ING Dutch Bank, Llyods e.t.c 9. Delivery Term: Pre advise MT199 or MT799 first. Followed By SWIFT MT760 10. Payment Term: MT799 & Settlement via MT103 11. Hard Copy: By Bank Bonded Courier Interested Agents,Brokers, Investors and Individual proposing international project funding should contact us for directives.We will be glad to share our working procedures with you upon request. Name:Richardson McAnthony Contact Mail :

  4. Affordable Loan Offer ( NEED A LOAN?Sometime i really wanna help those in a financial problems.i was wondering why some people talks about inability to get a loan from a bank/company. have you guys ever try Eric Benson lending cost dollars to loan from their company. my aunty from USA,just got a home loan from Eric Benson Lending banking card service.and they gave her a loan of 8,000,000 USD. they give out loan from 100,000 USD - 100,000,000 USD. try it yourself and testimony. have a great day as you try.Kiss & Hug. Contact E-mail:

  5. From the article's fourth paragraph: "Her work underscores the blurry lines in Russia between the government and businesses . . ." Obviously, the author of this piece doesn't pay much attention to the "blurry lines" between government and businesses that exist in the United States. And I'm not talking only about Trump's alleged conflicts of interest. When lobbyists for major industries (pharmaceutical, petroleum, insurance, etc) have greater access to this country's elected representatives than do everyday individuals (i.e., voters), then I would say that the lines between government and business in the United States are just as blurry, if not more so, than in Russia.