The Indiana Attorney General is going to use one of his little-known authorities to review the constitutionality of the provisions
of the recently passed U.S. Senate federal health-care bill.
Attorney General Greg Zoeller announced today his office will conduct the analysis, authorized by Indiana Code 4-6-8-2, on
particular provisions of Senate Amendment 2786 to the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act, H.R. 3590. Zoeller is conducting
the analysis based on a request from Sen. Richard Lugar, although he received similar requests from U.S. Reps. Dan Burton
and Mike Pence.
Attorneys in the AG's office will review the bill's constitutionality and its impact on state government agencies
if the current version were to pass. The bill has been controversial because it provides Nebraska with federal funding for
expanded obligations that all states participating in Medicaid would have to undertake.
The AG's office will review whether the provision that only funds Nebraska's obligations, but not those of other
states, would be constitutionally valid.
A report will be provided to the congressional delegation and their legislative staffs in time for the House-Senate conference
committee negotiations in Congress, according to the AG's office.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.