ILNews

Appeals filed in challenged mail-in ballot ruling

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The plaintiffs in a Marion County suit involving how challenged mail-in absentee ballots are counted have filed a verified appellate Rule 56(a) motion for the Indiana Supreme Court to accept jurisdiction over their appeal.

Raymond J. Schoettle, Erica Pugh, and the Marion County Republican Party filed the motion Oct. 31 after Marion Circuit Judge Theodore M. Sosin ordered in Raymond J. Schoettle, et al. v. Marion County Election Board, 49C01-0810-PL-049131, that the Marion County Election Board is to treat all challenged mail-in absentee votes as provisional ballots and set them aside for future resolution by the election board pursuant to Indiana Code Section 3-11.7. The order also required the election board to instruct all inspectors and precinct board members to follow the procedures outlined in the Indiana Election Day Handbook.

The Marion County Election Board filed an emergency motion for stay pending appeal Oct. 31 to the Indiana Court of Appeals, arguing the trial court's order is "internally contradictory" and "vague," so the election board can't be sure what it requires. The election board also argues the injunction requires it to use certain procedures relating to the counting of absentee ballots that violate Indiana law and the federal Help America Vote Act. They want the emergency stay because they say the injunction is unsupported by law and will require hundreds of poll workers to be retrained before Election Day.

Schoettle and other plaintiffs believe the Supreme Court should take the appeal because the Court of Appeals will effectively become the court of last resort because the courts are closed tomorrow in observance of Election Day. The plaintiffs argue if the election board doesn't have to comply with the trial court's mandate, then challenged ballots will be scanned into the ballot box on Election Day and there is no way to remove a ballot to determine its validity once it's been scanned. Also, if the election board isn't required to comply with Indiana law, its handling of challenged mail-in absentee ballots will differ from what every other Indiana county does, violating the mandate in Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. "...not those committed in the heat of an argument." If I ever see a man physically abusing a woman or a child and I'm close enough to intercede I will not ask him why he is abusing her/him. I will give him a split second to cease his attack and put his hands in the air while I call the police. If he continues, I will still call the police but to report, "Man down with a gunshot wound,"instead.

  2. And so the therapeutic state is weaonized. How soon until those with ideologies opposing the elite are disarmed in the name of mental health? If it can start anywhere it can start in the hoosiers' slavishly politically correct capital city.

  3. So this firebrand GOP Gov was set free by a "unanimous Supreme Court" , a court which is divided, even bitterly, on every culture war issue. WHAT A RESOUNDING SLAP in the Virginia Court's face! How bad must it have been. And all the journalists, lap dogs of the status quo they are, can do is howl that others cannot be railroaded like McDonald now??? Cannot reflect upon the ruining of Winston and Julia's life and love? (Oh I forget, the fiction at this Ministry of Truth is that courts can never err, and when they do, and do greatly, as here, why then it must be ignored, since it does not compute.)

  4. My daughter is a addict and my grandson was taken by DCS and while in hospital for overdose my daughter was told to sign papers from DCS giving up her parental rights of my grandson to the biological father's mom and step-dad. These people are not the best to care for him and I was never called or even given the chance to take him, but my daughter had given me guardianship but we never went to court to finalize the papers. Please I have lost my daughter and I dont want to lose my grandson as well. I hope and look forward to speaking with you God Bless and Thank You for all of your help

  5. To Bob- Goooooood, I'm glad you feel that way! He's alive and happy and thriving and out and I'm his woman and we live in West Palm Beach Florida, where his parents have a sprawling estate on an exclusive golf course......scum bag

ADVERTISEMENT