On Tuesday, two panels of Indiana Court of Appeals judges will travel north to hear arguments.
Chief Judge Margret Robb and Judges Ezra Friedlander and James Kirsch visit Rochester High School to hear the appeal of Maurice
Davis, who was convicted of Class A felony possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Davis appeals the denial of his petition
for post-conviction relief.
Arguments in Maurice Davis v. State of Indiana, No. 49A02-1008-PC-1005, begin at 10:05 a.m. Those who would like
to attend the argument should call the high school at 574-223-2176 to find out specific details about the school’s visitor
sign-in policy.
At 1 p.m., Judges Patricia Riley, Melissa May, and Paul Mathias will hear arguments at Taylor University in the case of Justin
Corwin v. State of Indiana, No. 79A04-1005-CR-296. Arguments will be held in the Ayres Alumni Memorial Building, Room
215.
On interlocutory appeal, Justin Corwin appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence found by police during a Terry
stop. The evidence was a bottle with prescription medicine for which Corwin didn’t have a valid prescription.
ILNews
Appellate judges to go to Rochester, Upland for arguments
IL Staff
April 15, 2011
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
-
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
-
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
-
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
-
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
-
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Conversations
0 Comments
Add Comment