ILNews

Arbitration of FCRA claim survives bankruptcy discharge

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A man’s Fair Credit Reporting Act claim can be arbitrated even though the debt was addressed and discharged in bankruptcy proceedings, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today.

Brian Brough entered into a contract with Green Tree Servicing, in which Green Tree loaned Brough money to buy a mobile home. The contract included an arbitration clause. Brough also agreed that Green Tree could share information about him and his account with credit reporting agencies.

Brough defaulted on the contract and filed for bankruptcy in 2003. His debt to Green Tree was addressed in the proceedings and the bankruptcy court discharged Brough’s petition in November 2008. Green Tree then filed a suit against Brough, which wasn’t identified in the appeal, and Brough filed a counterclaim alleging Green Tree violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by reporting to credit agencies that he still owed the company a debt under the contract even though the matter was discharged in bankruptcy.

The trial court granted Brough’s request to vacate the arbitration order.

At issue in Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Brian D. Brough, No. 88A01-0911-CV-550, is whether the FCRA claim is subject to the arbitration provision in the contract.

The appeals court looked to U.S. District Court rulings from New York and Illinois to conclude that FCRA claims can be subject to arbitration clauses. In addition, Brough even admitted his claim is subject to the arbitration clause, noted Senior Judge John Sharpnack.

The judges also disagreed with Brough’s argument that the whole contract is not valid because it was terminated by his bankruptcy discharge. Again, the court looked outside of Indiana for authority and relied on In re Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 300 S.W.3d 818 (Tex. Ct. App. 2009). In that case, homeowners who defaulted on a home equity loan and filed for bankruptcy claimed they didn’t have to arbitrate the suit they filed against the lender because the bankruptcy proceedings released them from any further obligations under their agreements with the lender, including an agreement to arbitrate. The Texas appellate court ruled the arbitration agreement survived bankruptcy.

As is the case In re Wells, Brough’s bankruptcy proceeding ended, so the arbitration of his FCRA claim won’t jeopardize the bankruptcy case or affect his discharge, wrote Senior Judge Sharpnack. The contract’s arbitration clause wasn’t terminated by his bankruptcy discharge. The trial court must order the parties to attend arbitration.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hmmmmm ..... How does the good doctor's spells work on tyrants and unelected bureacrats with nearly unchecked power employing in closed hearings employing ad hoc procedures? Just askin'. ... Happy independence day to any and all out there who are "free" ... Unlike me.

  2. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  3. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  4. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  5. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

ADVERTISEMENT