ILNews

CASA, American Legion form partnership

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The CEO of the national organization of Court Appointed Special Advocates met Monday with high ranking members of the American Legion's Child Welfare Foundation in Indianapolis and the foundation's board approved a resolution for a partnership between the two organizations two days later.
 
Next it will go before the American Legion's full membership in the fall, where it is expected to pass.
This could impact the GAL/CASA office in Indiana, where more than 4,000 Indiana children remain on a waiting list for advocates in cases that involve abuse and neglect. All children in Child in Need of Services, or CHINS, cases must be appointed a GAL/CASA according to state statute, which is likely why so many children are still in need of help.

While this resolution formalizes the relationship between the American Legion and National CASA, last year the foundation awarded National CASA a $46,000 grant for outreach efforts, which resulted in the Forgotten Children Campaign.

Many American Legion members are already involved with their local CASA programs to help children, including Frank West of Indiana, a CASA and American Legion member who referred to the waiting list and how important it is that more volunteers participate. He mentioned that in Grant County there are 159 unassigned CASA cases, and 26 volunteers for the CHINS in that county.

He volunteers as a CASA, he said, because the military teaches its members they have a social obligation and it's important to get involved at the local level. He added, "CASA volunteer work is self-rewarding because you can see the child's appreciation when you tell him you are there to represent his best interests, not his parents."

This partnership would further promote CASA efforts by encouraging other American Legion members to participate in their local CASAs, potentially reaching out to more than 14,000 American Legion posts worldwide, or about 2.6 million members, plus their families and friends.

Michael Piraino, chief executive officer of the National CASA Association based in Seattle, said that this partnership is unique due to the number of American Legion members and because they are so spread out around the country.

He is excited about the partnership because the current American Legion volunteers are already doing a good job, and they are easy to train and motivated to help.

For more information about local CASA programs, contact the Indiana CASA program. Information about the American Legion's Child Welfare Foundation is available on their site.

The April 15-28, 2009 edition of Indiana Lawyer included a story about the waiting list for CHINS cases in Indiana.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  2. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  3. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

  4. Why in the world would someone need a person to correct a transcript when a realtime court reporter could provide them with a transcript (rough draft) immediately?

  5. This article proved very enlightening. Right ahead of sitting the LSAT for the first time, I felt a sense of relief that a score of 141 was admitted to an Indiana Law School and did well under unique circumstances. While my GPA is currently 3.91 I fear standardized testing and hope that I too will get a good enough grade for acceptance here at home. Thanks so much for this informative post.

ADVERTISEMENT