ILNews

Tax breaks for 2009

Rebecca Berfanger
January 6, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus


While taxes aren't due until April 15, it's never too early to consider what to discuss with a tax professional or what might be worth a little research before filing for 2009.

Those who bought new homes, new cars, office equipment, and/or have children may benefit from some of these credits if they have a qualifying income and meet other requirements.

First-time homeowners

For anyone who has bought a new home in 2009, they were likely already aware of the $8,000 tax credit, according to Kevin Sullivan of Katz Sapper & Miller, an Indianapolis accounting firm. Sullivan is an accountant and an attorney.

Some of the important aspects of this credit, he said, include that in early November 2009 it was expanded to include those who buy their first home after the original deadline of Nov. 30, 2009, to April 30, 2010.

According to IRS.gov, another change is a new credit for "long-time residents" of up to $6,500.

"To qualify this way, a buyer must have owned and used the same home as a principal or primary residence for at least five consecutive years of the eightyear period ending on the date of purchase of a new home as a primary residence," according to IRS.gov.

Sullivan suggested individuals bring certain materials, such as closing documents, to meetings with their tax professionals when discussing whether they qualify for either of these credits.

And while the $8,000 credit requires the homeowner have the home as a principal residence for at least three years, he said it was worth considering whether this would be an issue for the homeowner if he or she might be moving in the next three years.

There are also other conditions, including income. For those who purchased after Nov. 6, 2009, homeowners can make a modified adjusted gross income up to $125,000 for single filers, or up to $225,000 for joint filers. A reduced credit is available to those with MAGI between $125,000 and $145,000, or $225,000 and $245,000 for joint filers.

The previous MAGI limits apply to those who bought a new home before Nov. 6, 2009: "the full credit is available to taxpayers with MAGI up to $75,000, or $150,000 for joint filers. Those with MAGI between $75,000 and $95,000, or $150,000 and $170,000 for joint filers, are eligible for a reduced credit," according to IRS.gov.

The value of the home also determines the credit - it is 10 percent of the purchase price of the home up to $8,000 for those with the lower incomes, so if someone were to buy a house for $50,000, they would only get $5,000 of the potential $8,000 they might otherwise qualify for. No credit is available if the purchase price of the home is more than $800,000.

New car owners

Another large purchase that may result in a tax break is a new car.

Tax attorney Gregory J. Cagnassola, of DeFur Voran in Fishers, said anyone who bought a new car in 2009 who meets the income restrictions can deduct state and local sales and excise taxes.

Individuals qualify if they make up to $125,000, and then the credit is phased out for those who make up to $135,000 as individual filers. The income limit is $250,000 for joint filers, and is phased out for those who make up to $260,000 as joint filers.

He suggested that individuals bring their receipts when meeting with tax professionals. This credit applies to individuals who bought cars between Feb. 16, 2009, and Jan. 1, 2010, according to IRS.gov.

Parents

Individuals with children may also be able to receive more money this year.

The refundable portion of the child tax credit was increased for 2009 and 2010, and parents of children who are in college also have a couple incentives to address the cost of education, Cagnassola said.

For parents who claim college-age children as dependents, he suggested looking into whether the Hope Education Credit, now known as the American Opportunity Credit, would now apply because income levels have increased, and the credit was also extended to include four years of post-secondary education, as opposed to the previous two-year limit. The maximum amount, depending on expenses and income, is $2,500.

"Along the same lines for education, qualifying beneficiaries of 529 Plans can use tax redistribution to help pay for computers," he said. "Everyone needs a laptop in college, and this is a way to take a little bit of a bite out of the cost."

Small firms

For solo practitioners and attorneys with home offices, there are a few tax breaks worth looking into, Cagnassola and Sullivan said.

For instance, how one can consider if they can claim the depreciation of new equipment has changed, and Cagnassola added the IRS has become more accepting of home office claims in recent years.

While neither tax professional had a reason for an individual to not claim a credit, Cagnassola said he used to caution clients when claiming tax credits on home offices because they'd be more likely to be audited. Now that doesn't happen as often as it used to.

Both tax professionals also highly encouraged anyone to seek help from a tax professional, but recommended looking for 2009 tax information on the IRS' Web site, www.irs.gov. Sullivan also recommended www.CCH.com, the Web site of Commerce Clearing House, which he said is often referred to by tax attorneys and accountants when they want more information.

Depending on how one feels about who is eligible for tax credits, Sullivan said, "It's Congress' way of trying to target the deduction to who they have in their minds as people who can benefit from the credit and ... how the economy will benefit from a particular class of tax payers. The limitations and phase outs are determined by Congress to achieve those objectives. Whether it'll be effective or not, we'll leave it to them to figure that out."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT