ILNews

Sidebars: Left Bank Cafe offers delightful canal setting

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Sidebars

We give Left Bank Café 2 1/2 gavels!

I love sitting outside for lunch or dinner during the summer. But there is something about Indy and that concept that makes me giggle.

Indy restaurants/bars/cafes will put outside seating no matter their locale/setting/view. Haven’t you ever noticed a few tables set out in front of a place that just makes you scratch your head and say “I’m not sure I’d enjoy sitting outside there watching/smelling/hearing (fill in the blank).”

Well, we found a delightful outside venue where that won’t be your complaint. The Left Bank Café is located on the canal walk in downtown Indy.

I know it is not necessarily near a courthouse, but on a pleasant summer day it is worth a little extra effort to stroll the canal and grab a bite at the Left Bank Café. Sure there is foot traffic, some bike traffic, and the Segway tours (which Fred could do circles around them on his!). But it beats looking over a busy intersection inhaling bus exhaust. It is a small cafe with plenty of good outdoor seating located on the canal level of the newly constructed Cosmopolitan apartment building at 310 W. Michigan St.

I had lunch there with my husband last week and was very impressed considering it’s in its infancy. Fred and our associate, Tyler, returned for lunch in hopes of a repeat. It was close, but the kinks are still getting ironed out. Their menu is somewhat aggressive and diverse given its size, and the café fortunately does not restrict itself to the coffee-house standards. They offer a variety of flatbread pizzas, paninis, and crêpes.

The flatbreads are not really traditional pizzas as they are smaller portions of flatbreads with three varieties of toping mixes. Andouille sausage, red pepper pesto, red onions, and pecorino cheese adorn one. Another is with Italian sausage, honey Dijon, portobello mushrooms, red peppers, and provolone. For the vegetarians there is one topped with spinach, goat cheese, and garlic-infused olive oil. On the prior trip we had the Andouille flatbread, which was very satisfying. Insisting Fred and Tyler try it, we ordered one. However there was a mix-up in the kitchen, which combined the Andouille sausage flatbread ingredients with the Italian sausage one. That was a bit disappointing because the flavor mixture of Andouille sausage flatbread, as promised on the menu, is quite delectable. Tyler had the Italian sausage flatbread for his entrée, and it, too, had the ingredients mixed up. Another disappointment, but we moved on. (The chef did apologize and was extremely sincere so that gained back some credibility).

Fred had the crêpe with chicken, mushroom, and spinach. He was satisfied and it was hearty, but he wasn’t heartily satisfied. Some more flavor kick would have been welcomed. They also offer an apple and leek crêpe, a smoked salmon crêpe, a veggie crêpe, and a spinach and artichoke crêpe, so there are some choices. A number of sweet crêpes also are available.

The panini I had was the three cheeses (brie, gruyere, and provolone) with apple wood bacon and tomato, served with chips. I really liked it. I also sampled the Caesar salad that had a variation of the traditional dressing with what appeared to be cornbread croutons – mmmmm. You have to judge for yourself. My husband had the Rueben which sated him, and it was not so heavy that it sends you for a nap. The other panini include pulled pork or chicken with red onion and cheddar jack; cheese steak; grilled Portobello; and a veggie selection.

The overall experience earned 3 gavels from me, but Fred would give it 2 because of the flatbreads mix-up and because his elitist sausage taste was not impressed with the quality of meats on the flatbreads and antipasti plate. I love the setting, the menu selection, and as an after-work venue they are hoping for a liquor license soon. Give it a try – I have faith they’ll work out the kinks ­– and enjoy a view that is unique to the downtown area.

Left Bank Café is at Canal Walk level, 310 W. Michigan St.; 317-642-3305. Hours are Monday through Thursday 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Friday through Sunday.•

__________

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer M. Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn Paul Hogan & Merriman in Indianapolis, focusing in criminal defense. Vaiana is a 1992 graduate of the John Marshall Law School in Chicago. Lukemeyer earned her J.D. from Southern Methodist University in 1994 and is active in the Indianapolis Bar Association, Indianapolis Inn of Courts, and the Teen Court Program. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the authors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT