ILNews

Human trafficking cases on the rise in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

While it may still be an issue under the radar of many Hoosiers, human trafficking seems to be thriving in Indiana. Domestic violence victims’ advocates, human rights attorneys, and immigration lawyers report that they are seeing more victims each year.

Whether the increase is due to more awareness among victims or more outreach from organizations that have worked with victims is hard to tell, according to victims’ advocates. But either way, they agree it’s an issue that can’t be ignored.
 

kuzma-abigail-mug Kuzma

The issue first came to the attention of Abigail Lawlis Kuzma, currently the director and chief counsel of the Consumer Protection Division of the Indiana Attorney General’s Office, when she was still executive director of the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic.

One of her first trafficking cases was six or seven years ago, she said, when a victim came to NCLC after he escaped from a warehouse in Pennsylvania. A human trafficker, possibly a coyote, someone who brings people over the border from Mexico for a fee, promised the worker that he would have a normal job and a place to live.

Instead, the victim worked 12 hours a day, ate and slept in the warehouse, and was guarded by armed men.

“Somehow a family member figured it out, was able to smuggle him out, and he was on the run,” she said. “Someone he knew advised him to talk to me. I told him these people were operating illegally and they had no right to hold him.”

Ultimately, she said, the man wouldn’t accept NCLC’s services, so she doesn’t know what happened to him.

“He wanted to believe me, but he was afraid I was lying to him,” she said. Kuzma said this is a common scenario.

For some, said Raio G. Krishnayya, executive director of the Center for Victim and Human Rights in Indianapolis, the way victims are treated in the United States is how workers are typically treated in their home countries.

It’s also difficult to get victims to see themselves as victims, he said, as many think they owe a debt to their traffickers or still think their situation in the United States is better than it would be if they were at home.

This also makes it difficult for victims to cooperate with law enforcement because they may not see a benefit, at least at first. On the flip side, he said, a defense attorney could claim that a victim cooperated with police so he could get a visa to stay in this country legally.

Foreign nationals who are trafficked into the United States may be eligible to receive a T visa, which is available to victims of human trafficking.

However, in many cases, it’s easier to get a U visa, available to victims of crimes who cooperate with police; an S visa, for witnesses of crimes who cooperate with police; asylum status, if the victim has a reason to fear returning to his or her home country; or Special Immigrant Juvenile Status for juveniles who’ve been abused and have no one to take care of them in their home country.

These other options are possibly the reason why of the 5,000 T visas available on an annual basis, between 2001 and 2005, only 1,084 visas were issued.

However, Kuzma said, the low number is probably because it is simply difficult to find victims, even though the estimated number of human trafficking victims in the United States is between 14,500 and 17,500 men, women, and children.

To receive a T visa, one must prove he or she was recruited, harbored, or obtained by means of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of involuntary servitude, debt bondage, slavery, or sex trade, Kuzma explained.

While the victim who worked in the warehouse in Pennsylvania didn’t end up accepting help from NCLC, another victim she met in 2007, a 16-year-old girl from Honduras, was willing to accept Kuzma’s assistance.

The girl was abducted by a gang member and prostituted from the age of 13 or 14 until she was 15. When she was 15, she believed she was going to visit her mother in the United States, but instead she was taken to the United States-Mexico border where she was again prostituted by the man she was traveling with. She was handed off at the border, and she was stopped by border patrol without shoes, a common occurrence among human trafficking victims, Kuzma said.

Even though she wasn’t trafficked in this country, Kuzma said she was able to make the case that the trafficker brought her to the border for the purpose of trafficking her. The prosecution agreed, and the girl was ultimately able to stay with her mother while waiting for relief, which she received in 2008.

Locally, domestic violence victims’ advocates have also noticed an increase in human trafficking cases in Indiana.

Laura Berry Berman, executive director of the Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence, said she often hears from shelter directors that victims are coming to them.

“What’s very interesting is the rural shelters are seeing these issues more so than urban,” she said. One recent example involved a woman who only spoke Mandarin Chinese who had a baby and was kicked out of a communal living situation. The hospital wasn’t sure of her situation, so someone from there called a domestic violence shelter in southern Indiana to ask for help.

She added the power and control issues of human traffickers were similar to those of abusers in domestic violence relationships, which is why she thought many of the victims end up at shelters.

Berman has also noticed an increase in victims seeking T visas and U visas.

What has helped, she said, is a statewide taskforce of law enforcement officers, lawyers, and service providers who are working together to provide resources. She said there are also plans for a resource guide and a statewide training specifically on this issue to take place sometime next spring.

While no longer at NCLC working directly with victims, Kuzma has been working with the AG’s office as part of another outreach program.

“We are going to talk to different groups about how to identify victims,” she said. “An important piece of this is to get the word out among the general public that human trafficking does exist, and that we make sure everyone knows it’s in our community.”

She said other departments are also on alert, such as the Indiana Department of Labor, which has been asked to remain vigilant of calls that come in regarding unfair wages or employment practices that might relate to human trafficking.

She said police officers are also supposed to be aware of how to interact with potential victims of human trafficking, especially when it comes to prostitution and underage girls who have likely been coerced into their jobs, even if they don’t see it that way.

Outreach efforts will include domestic violence shelters, hospitals that treat low-income and uninsured populations, and community organizations that might be able to recognize victims if they know what to look for.

For instance, Kuzma said, if a hospital or clinic notices a pattern where young girls are showing up with venereal diseases, they might be part of a prostitution ring and possibly victims of human trafficking.

“Or if you see a girl who is not in school who seems to be working somewhere – including next door and working there all hours, like a domestic slave, if not for you, who would be asking the question? Maybe if you see her in a grocery line, maybe that’s the opportunity to find out who she is,” she said.

The statewide hotline number to call is 1-800-928-6403, she added.

Krishnayya added attorneys can help by speaking out against various shortfalls in the system when it comes to finding and helping victims, and by helping victims when possible.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Do I have to hire an attorney to get co-guardianship of my brother? My father has guardianship and my older sister was his co-guardian until this Dec 2014 when she passed and my father was me to go on as the co-guardian, but funds are limit and we need to get this process taken care of quickly as our fathers health isn't the greatest. So please advise me if there is anyway to do this our self or if it requires a lawyer? Thank you

  2. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  3. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  4. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  5. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

ADVERTISEMENT