ILNews

IBA: Bar Leadership for 2011 in Place

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With nearly 40 groups within the Indianapolis Bar to provide service and support, it takes great leadership to accomplish the lofty goals set for each. Indianapolis Bar Association President-elect Mike Hebenstreit has announced the appointed/election of the Bar members that have answered the call to serve as a Chair in 2011.

Alternative Dispute Resolution Section
Elisabeth Edwards, Jocham Harden Dimick Jackson PC

Appellate Practice Section
Jane Dall Wilson, Baker & Daniels LLP

Business Law Section
E. Joseph Kremp III, Wooden & McLaughlin LLP

Commercial and Bankruptcy Section
Kevin P. Dempsey, U.S. Bankruptcy Court

Criminal Justice Section
Alexander P. Will, Office of Corporation Counsel

Environmental Law Section
Vicki J. Wright, Krieg DeVault LLP

Estate Planning and Administration Section
Christi R. Anderson, Bingham McHale LLP

Family Law Section
Alicia Gooden, The Mediation Group

Government Practice Section
Sue Beesley, Bingham McHale LLP

Health Care Section
Leeanne Coons, Krieg DeVault LLP

Intellectual Property Section
Marta Paul, Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry

Labor and Employment Law Section
Jeffrey B. Halbert, Stewart & Irwin PC

Law Student Division
Kristin B. Arthur, Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis

Litigation Section
Stephanie L. Cassman, Lewis Wagner LLP

Real Estate & Land Use Section
David Duncan, Tabbert Hahn Earnest & Weddle LLP

Senior Counsel Division
The Hon. Robyn L. Moberly, Marion Superior Court

Sole Practitioner/Small Firm Practice Section
Jason Reyome, J. Reyome & A. Demos Counselors at Law

Sports and Entertainment Law Section
Kenan L. Farrell, KLF Legal

Taxation Section
Katrina Clingerman, Ice Miller LLP

Women and the Law Division
Germain Willett, Ice Miller LLP

Young Lawyers Division
Colleen Powers, Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman LLP

Bar Leader Committee
The Hon. Robyn L. Moberly, Marion Superior Court

Bar Review Committee
Kelly Eskew, Clarian Health Partners Inc.

Bench Bar Committee
The Hon. Sheila Carlisle, Marion Superior Court

Diversity Job Fair Committee
Tamara McMillian, Flashpoint HR

Finance Committee
Jeffrey Abrams, Benesch/Dann Pecar

Grievance Committee
M. Kent Newton, Newton Becker Bouwkamp Pendoski,PC

Justice Center Task Force
John F. Kautzman, Ruckeslhaus Kautzman Blackwell Bemis & Hasbrook

Legal Services Advisory Committee
Jeff Meunier, Attorney at Law

Legislative Committee
The Hon. Heather Welch, Marion Superior Court

Membership Committee
Aubrey Kuchar, Kightlinger & Gray

Nominating Committee
George Plews, Plews Shadley Racher & Braun

Paralegal Committee
Jodie L. Bergeron, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP

Personnel Committee
Mike Hebenstreit, Whitham Hebenstreit & Zubek

Pro Bono Committee
Andrew Campbell, Baker & Daniels LLP

Professionalism Committee
The Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, U.S. District Court•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. He TIL team,please zap this comment too since it was merely marking a scammer and not reflecting on the story. Thanks, happy Monday, keep up the fine work.

  2. You just need my social security number sent to your Gmail account to process then loan, right? Beware scammers indeed.

  3. The appellate court just said doctors can be sued for reporting child abuse. The most dangerous form of child abuse with the highest mortality rate of any form of child abuse (between 6% and 9% according to the below listed studies). Now doctors will be far less likely to report this form of dangerous child abuse in Indiana. If you want to know what this is, google the names Lacey Spears, Julie Conley (and look at what happened when uninformed judges returned that child against medical advice), Hope Ybarra, and Dixie Blanchard. Here is some really good reporting on what this allegation was: http://media.star-telegram.com/Munchausenmoms/ Here are the two research papers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213487900810 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213403000309 25% of sibling are dead in that second study. 25%!!! Unbelievable ruling. Chilling. Wrong.

  4. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  5. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

ADVERTISEMENT