ILNews

Opinions Nov. 5, 2012

November 5, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions by IL deadline. Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Steven E. Miles, a/k/a Robert Dutcher v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1204-PC-310
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Patrick Fluker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1203-CR-137
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony murder enhanced due to use of a firearm and Class D felony receiving stolen property.

Maurice Higgins v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1204-CR-189
Criminal. Reverses revocation of probation and remands to the trial court ordering Higgins' immediate release from Department of Correction. The appeals court ruled that that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking Higgins’ probation on the basis of an arrest for which a jury found him not guilty.

Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of: R.P., Minor Child, B.H., Mother v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services, and Child Advocates, Inc. (NFP)
49A02-1202-JT-84
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT