ITLA members steer teens from trouble on the road

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

Terre Haute attorney Steve Williams concedes that a lot of people will have to do a lot of things to stop the enormous problem of distracted driving.

Cell phones, text messages, eating and talking to other passengers can take the driver’s attention away from the road and, combined with the speed cars now travel, tragedy can result.

The Indiana Trial Lawyers Association’s College of Fellows joined the effort to stop the problem when it started offering the End Distracted Driving – Student Awareness Campaign in 2012. Members met with teenagers around the state and gave a PowerPoint presentation about the dangers of inattention behind the wheel.

williams-steve.jpg Williams

Although the ITLA originally planned to offer the distracted driving project for just one year, the comments and positive reactions from teenagers, teachers and parents have inspired the organization to continue going into high schools for another school year.

“We wanted to help with the problem, and we feel like we are helping,” said Williams, president of the ITLA College of Fellows. “As trial lawyers, we feel like we’re very well prepared to do this kind of thing because we do it every day.”

The ITLA fellows decided to focus on distracted driving after member Neil Comer’s granddaughter was killed while texting and driving. They have partnered with the Casey Feldman Foundation; EndDD, which is sponsored by the foundation; and 60 for Safety to present the campaign to Indiana teenagers.

Williams credits the success of the project to the PowerPoint presentation created by the Casey Feldman Foundation. The foundation was established by Philadelphia attorney Joel Feldman, whose daughter, Casey, was killed by a distracted driver.

The presentation, Williams said, is custom made for trial lawyers used to talking and trying to persuade juries and judges.

National trend

Not surprising, trial lawyers say they are dealing with more cases that involve distracted driving. More and more, root causes of auto accidents and collisions are linked to drivers multi-tasking when operating a vehicle.

“It’s a very common element in a lot of different cases nowadays,” Williams said, “because this problem is so prevalent.”

Distracted driving is not limited to cell phone use and texting. According to the 2011 National Phone Survey on Distracted Driving Attitudes and Behaviors, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation, many activities can potentially draw a driver’s attention from the road ahead.

The most common are driving while talking to other passengers, adjusting the car radio, eating and drinking, making or accepting phone calls, interacting with children in the backseat and using a portable music player.

Williams defined distracted driving as “anything that takes the attention away from the primary task of driving.”

Among the key findings of the survey: A majority of respondents (66 percent) stated they typically kept driving when they received calls. Also, many (45 percent) held the phone while driving instead of using a hands-free device.

The activity of texting while driving is higher for those under 25. According to the survey, 44 percent of 18- to 20-year-olds and 49 percent of 21- to 24-year-olds were likely to send texts while behind the wheel. This compares to 26 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds, 29 percent of 35- to 44-year-olds and 8 percent of 45- to 65-year-olds.

As these statistics reflect, young adults can test the limits of behavior or may not consider the consequences their actions can have. Moreover, they are often stereotyped as uninterested in what their elders say.

Richmond attorney David Burton believes taking the time to go into the schools and make the presentation is worth the effort.

“Even though you think teens are going to do what they are going to do, they are still impressionable,” Burton said. “Maybe it’s possible to try to alter their habits.”

He compared the growing current situation of distracted driving with the prevalence of drunken driving 40 years ago. Through the work and public awareness campaigns of organizations like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, society’s attitudes changed.

Similarly, he thinks the social and moral consequences of driving distracted will have to be emphasized in order to dramatically change the behavior of teens and adults.

The PowerPoint brings out some of the social and moral aspects by focusing on the ethical obligations teen drivers have, Burton said. Without shaming the teenagers, the presentation highlights that the choices they make while driving could have implications for themselves, their passengers and other drivers on the road.

Powerful PowerPoint

kehoe Kehoe

The program is designed not only to get teenagers to change their behavior, but also to encourage them to talk to their parents, siblings and other relatives about the dangers of distracted driving. The teenagers are encouraged to become leaders and educate their families.

Attorneys have described the 50-minute presentation as “powerful.” It is based on psychological and sociological research to appeal especially to teenagers.

The presentation includes video clips and opportunities for interaction by role playing and asking the students questions. In addition, the Casey Feldman Foundation added a video about Comer’s granddaughter to make the PowerPoint more relevant to Hoosier students.

Bruce Kehoe, partner at Wilson Kehoe & Winingham LLC, noted the presentation is “one of those events you don’t walk away from without being touched.”

From his presentation at Centerville Senior High School, Kehoe remembered a young man in the audience who talked about his father, an emergency room physician, who texts all the time. The student said he was going to go home and tell his dad what he had learned.

Kehoe chose to give a presentation at his alma mater, Centerville.

“I just really enjoyed the experience,” Kehoe said. “I was really so pleased and impressed with the level of attention and engagement they gave.”

Afterward, he received a handwritten thank you note from the school’s principal that mentioned many students came to school the next day sporting the black “End Distracted Driving” wrist bands.

Williams maintains the project is having an impact. Since giving the presentation at Vigo County high schools, Williams said students have stopped him on the street and parents have written him letters, telling him how much the program meant to them. Even the students at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology were enthralled when they saw the PowerPoint.

For the second year, ITLA plans to do more outreach to schools, enabling more students to see the presentation.

“Our obligation is to educate young drivers about the dangers of distracted driving,” Williams said, “so they can make intelligent decisions not to drive distracted.” •


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Lori, you must really love wedding cake stories like this one ... happy enuf ending for you?

  2. This new language about a warning has not been discussed at previous meetings. It's not available online. Since it must be made public knowledge before the vote, does anyone know exactly what it says? Further, this proposal was held up for 5 weeks because members Carol and Lucy insisted that all terms used be defined. So now, definitions are unnecessary and have not been inserted? Beyond these requirements, what is the logic behind giving one free pass to discriminators? Is that how laws work - break it once and that's ok? Just don't do it again? Three members of Carmel's council have done just about everything they can think of to prohibit an anti-discrimination ordinance in Carmel, much to Brainard's consternation, I'm told. These three 'want to be so careful' that they have failed to do what at least 13 other communities, including Martinsville, have already done. It's not being careful. It's standing in the way of what 60% of Carmel residents want. It's hurting CArmel in thT businesses have refused to locate because the council has not gotten with the program. And now they want to give discriminatory one free shot to do so. Unacceptable. Once three members leave the council because they lost their races, the Carmel council will have unanimous approval of the ordinance as originally drafted, not with a one free shot to discriminate freebie. That happens in January 2016. Why give a freebie when all we have to do is wait 3 months and get an ordinance with teeth from Day 1? If nothing else, can you please get s copy from Carmel and post it so we can see what else has changed in the proposal?

  3. Here is an interesting 2012 law review article for any who wish to dive deeper into this subject matter: Excerpt: "Judicial interpretation of the ADA has extended public entity liability to licensing agencies in the licensure and certification of attorneys.49 State bar examiners have the authority to conduct fitness investigations for the purpose of determining whether an applicant is a direct threat to the public.50 A “direct threat” is defined as “a significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by a modification of policies, practices or procedures, or by the provision of auxiliary aids or services as provided by § 35.139.”51 However, bar examiners may not utilize generalizations or stereotypes about the applicant’s disability in concluding that an applicant is a direct threat.52"

  4. We have been on the waiting list since 2009, i was notified almost 4 months ago that we were going to start receiving payments and we still have received nothing. Every time I call I'm told I just have to wait it's in the lawyers hands. Is everyone else still waiting?

  5. I hope you dont mind but to answer my question. What amendment does this case pretain to?