ILNews

Opinions August 26, 2013

IL Staff
August 26, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Opinions – Aug. 26, 2013

Indiana Court of Appeals

Stephanie Murry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1301-CR-39
Criminal. Affirms revocation of placement in Marion County Community Corrections.

Lysa Wefler v. Mark Wefler (NFP)
45A03-1206-DR-268
Domestic relations. Affirms holding of contempt of court against Lysa Welfer for violation of the settlement agreement in her dissolution of marriage.

Mir Iqbal, Et Al. v. S-Mart Petroleum, Inc. (NFP)
79A02-1210-MF-860
Mortgage forceclosure. Affirms trial court order in favor of S-Mart.

Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of D.C., Minor Child, and K.C., Mother: K.C. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services and Lake County Court Appointed Special Advocate (NFP)
45A03-1301-JT-22
Juvenile. Affirms termination of mother K.C.’s parental rights.

Kevin R. Harris v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1210-CR-445
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence for Class D felony criminal recklessness.

T.B. v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A02-1301-JV-113
Juvenile. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands adjudication of delinquency for two counts of what would have been Class B felony robbery if committed by an adult. Trial court is ordered to vacate one of the true findings of robbery as it violates the continuing crime doctrine.

Andrew D. Fisher v. State of Indiana (NFP)

38A04-1301-CR-41
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony attempted murder.

Derrick King v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A05-1211-CR-579
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct.

Anthony Robert Konsoer v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A05-1301-CR-30
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony dealing in methamphetamine.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court issued no opinions by IL deadline Monday.

U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued no Indiana opinions by IL deadline Monday.






 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Or does the study merely wish they fade away? “It just hasn’t risen substantially in decades,” Joan Williams, director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California Hastings College of the Law told Law360. “What we should be looking for is progress, and that’s not what we’re seeing.” PROGRESS = less white males in leadership. Thus the heading and honest questions here ....

  2. One need not wonder why we are importing sex slaves into North America. Perhaps these hapless victims of human trafficking were being imported for a book of play with the Royal Order of Jesters? https://medium.com/@HeapingHelping/who-are-the-royal-order-of-jesters-55ffe6f6acea Indianapolis hosts these major pervs in a big way .... https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Royal-Order-of-Jesters-National-Office/163360597025389 I wonder what affect they exert on Hoosier politics? And its judiciary? A very interesting program on their history and preferences here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtgBdUtw26c

  3. Joseph Buser, Montgomery County Chief Prosecutor, has been involved in both representing the State of Indiana as Prosecutor while filing as Representing Attorney on behalf of himself and the State of Indiana in Civil Proceedings for seized cash and merchandise using a Verified Complaint For Forfeiture of Motor Vehicle, Us Currency And Reimbursement Of Costs, as is evident in Montgomery County Circuit Court Case Number 54C01-1401-MI-000018, CCS below, seen before Judge Harry Siamas, and filed on 01/13/2014. Sheriff Mark Castille is also named. All three defendants named by summons have prior convictions under Mr. Buser, which as the Indiana Supreme Court, in the opinion of The Matter of Mark R. McKinney, No. 18S00-0905-DI-220, stated that McKinney created a conflict of interest by simultaneously prosecuting drug offender cases while pocketing assets seized from defendants in those cases. All moneys that come from forfeitures MUST go to the COMMON SCHOOL FUND.

  4. I was incarcerated at that time for driving while suspended I have no felonies...i was placed on P block I remember several girls and myself asking about voting that day..and wasn't given a answer or means of voting..we were told after the election who won that was it.

  5. The number one way to reduce suffering would be to ban the breeding of fighting dogs. Fighting dogs maim and kill victim dogs Fighting dogs are the most essential piece of dog fighting Dog fighting will continue as long as fighting dogs are struggling to reach each other and maul another fih.longaphernalia

ADVERTISEMENT