ILNews

Opinions Jan. 22, 2014

January 22, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
Antoine Duff v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1306-CR-503
Criminal. Affirms 16-year sentence, with 10 years executed and six years suspended, for Class B felony battery.

Anthony Barnett v. State of Indiana (NFP)
22A01-1302-PC-84
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Zachary Buza v. State of Indiana (NFP)
61A05-1304-CR-149
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony attempted murder, Class B felony attempted aggravated battery, two counts of Class C felony criminal recklessness and Class A misdemeanor battery resulting in bodily injury.

Michael E. Mattingly v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, and Meijer Stores Limited Partnership (NFP)
93A02-1304-EX-383
Agency action. Affirms denial of unemployment benefits.

Bruce Jones v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1304-CR-363
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license.

In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of B.B. and B.B. (Minor Children), A.S. (Mother) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services (NFP)
49A02-1305-JT-431
Juvenile. Affirms denial of mother’s motion for relief from judgment following termination of parental rights.

Michael T. Smith v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1304-CR-172
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony child molesting.

Challie A. Gray v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1306-CR-534  
Criminal. Affirms murder conviction.

Antonio D. Johnson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A04-1305-CR-241
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.

Kevin Joseph Cherrone v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1305-CR-187
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor domestic battery.

Tabitha Edwards v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-1305-CR-444
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person and Class D felony operating a vehicle while intoxicated with a prior within five years.

Justin Kyle Loy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A04-1303-CR-148
Criminal. Affirms order revoking probation.

J.F. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1305-JV-247
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication as a delinquent child for committing what would be Class D felony theft if committed by an adult.

Reginald Binion v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A05-1304-CR-177
Criminal. Affirms 15-year sentence following guilty plea to Class B felony attempted armed robbery.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana decisions by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The is an unsigned editorial masquerading as a news story. Almost everyone quoted was biased in favor of letting all illegal immigrants remain in the U.S. (Ignoring that Obama deported 3.5 million in 8 years). For some reason Obama enforcing part of the immigration laws was O.K. but Trump enforcing additional parts is terrible. I have listed to press conferences and explanations of the Homeland Security memos and I gather from them that less than 1 million will be targeted for deportation, the "dreamers" will be left alone and illegals arriving in the last two years -- especially those arriving very recently -- will be subject to deportation but after the criminals. This will not substantially affect the GDP negatively, especially as it will take place over a number of years. I personally think this is a rational approach to the illegal immigration problem. It may cause Congress to finally pass new immigration laws rationalizing the whole immigration situation.

  2. Mr. Straw, I hope you prevail in the fight. Please show us fellow American's that there is a way to fight the corrupted justice system and make them an example that you and others will not be treated unfairly. I hope you the best and good luck....

  3. @ President Snow - Nah, why try to fix something that ain't broken??? You do make an excellent point. I am sure some Mickey or Minnie Mouse will take Ruckers seat, I wonder how his retirement planning is coming along???

  4. Can someone please explain why Judge Barnes, Judge Mathias and Chief Judge Vaidik thought it was OK to re weigh the evidence blatantly knowing that by doing so was against the rules and went ahead and voted in favor of the father? I would love to ask them WHY??? I would also like to ask the three Supreme Justices why they thought it was OK too.

  5. How nice, on the day of my car accident on the way to work at the Indiana Supreme Court. Unlike the others, I did not steal any money or do ANYTHING unethical whatsoever. I am suing the Indiana Supreme Court and appealed the failure of the district court in SDIN to protect me. I am suing the federal judge because she failed to protect me and her abandonment of jurisdiction leaves her open to lawsuits because she stripped herself of immunity. I am a candidate for Indiana Supreme Court justice, and they imposed just enough sanction so that I am made ineligible. I am asking the 7th Circuit to remove all of them and appoint me as the new Chief Justice of Indiana. That's what they get for dishonoring my sacrifice and and violating the ADA in about 50 different ways.

ADVERTISEMENT