ILNews

DTCI: Did you miss this? Kudos, News & Blogs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Kudos to Jason Kennedy, DTCI member at Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney in Chicago, who received a defense verdict in Stanley v. Ameren Illinois Co., an asbestos exposure case. The court found the defendants owed no duty to warn a subcontractor’s employee, granted summary judgment, and dismissed all four defendants named.

Kori L. McOmber, member of the DTCI board of directors and former partner in Schultz & Pogue in Indianapolis, has recently joined Indiana University Health Risk Retention Group where she assists in managing professional negligence and general negligence cases at various Indiana University Health institutions throughout the state.

Libby Valos Moss, member of the DTCI board of directors and partner at Kightlinger & Gray, is chairing a Feb. 13 webcast for DRI on “Medicare Lien Recovery Extending Now to Medicare Advantage Plans – Are You at Risk?”

Rick Shoultz and Lewis Wooton, DTCI members, report in the Lewis Wagner newsletter that in Deeter v. Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Co., the court confirmed that a standard, intentional act exclusion that excludes coverage for intentional acts of “any insured” will withstand the claims of an innocent co-insured.

Will Kelley, DTCI member at Drewry Simmons Vornehm, reports that, in SAMS Hotel Group, LLC v. Environs, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit recently upheld enforcement of a contractual limitation of liability clause, which resulted in the design professional’s liability being capped at $70,000 despite the owner’s claim that its damages were more than $4.2 million.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT