AG files Medicaid fraud charges against Anderson dental office owner and employees

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Nine individuals from an Anderson dental office, including three dentists and the owner, are facing criminal charges for allegedly obtaining hundreds of thousands of dollars from Medicaid illegally, the Indiana attorney general announced Wednesday.

Criminal charges filed in Madison County Circuit Court 6 claim that Anderson Dental Center owner Sally Metzner and her co-defendants engaged in a scheme to submit false and inflated bills for dental services to the Indiana Medicaid program.

The probable cause affidavit highlights repeated instances of using the Medicaid provider number of one dentist when billing the work from another dentist; using the Medicaid number and Drug Enforcement Agency registration number of one dentist for prescriptions written by other dentists; filing Medicaid claims under the name of a dentist who no longer worked at the office; and submitting claims for the expensive procedure of deep sedation when only a local anesthetic was administered.

Metzner, 57, of Anderson has been charged with two counts of corrupt business influence, as a Class C felony. She has also been charged with money laundering, Medicaid fraud, theft, forgery and practicing dentistry without a license.

The three dentists charged with corrupt business influence, money laundering, Medicaid fraud and theft are:
Paul Pangallo, 73, Indianapolis; Jeffrey Rich, 69, Cicero; Thomas Dubois, 46, Indianapolis.

Office employees charged with corrupt business influence are: Jessica (Metzner) Worrell, 27, Anderson, also charged with forgery;
Beth Flynn-Lohrey, 45, Middletown, also charged with prescription drug fraud; Chris Martin, 31, Anderson, also charged with prescription drug fraud; Barbara Brooks, 62, Anderson, also charged with forgery.  

A fifth administrative staff member, Deborah R. Davis, 55, Middletown, was charged with prescription drug fraud only.

The affidavit also alleged that the fraudulent billing continued even after authorities had executed search warrants at the office.

The Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit joined with the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service and local authorities to investigate Anderson Dental Center. The investigation included executing three searches of the dental office, reviewing Medicaid claims, interviewing employees and co-defendants, and obtaining information from local pharmacies.  



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.