ILNews

Leadership in Law 2014: Phillip L. Bayt

Chief managing partner, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis • Indiana University Maurer School of Law, 1980

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
15col-Bayt.jpg Phillip L. Bayt (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

Phillip L. Bayt has shepherded Ice Miller LLP through significant changes in the business and legal markets. Phil led the effort to combine the firm with the Ohio regional firm of Schottenstein Zox and Dunn Co. LPA, which added nearly 100 lawyers and two new offices to Ice Miller. In addition to building one of the leading practices in the state for sophisticated real estate transactions, he is a civic leader who has been involved in many major projects that have enhanced downtown Indianapolis and central Indiana.

Last year you led the firm through a successful rebranding effort – the first in 10 years. Why is it important to update the firm’s outward image?

It’s important to share with our clients and our prospective clients some clear messages about who we are and what we do to protect our clients’ interests. While our prior brand image served us well, it was time for a more up-to-date look and a new take on how we share that message.

Why practice in the area of law that you do?

Our team helps our clients build buildings and businesses to achieve financial success and add value to the community. It is personally very rewarding to see every day the tangible results of the hard work and creativity of those efforts.

How has the law in the gaming industry changed since you started?

In the beginning it was enormously exciting to be an integral part of building an entire industry in the state of Indiana from scratch – from the adoption of legislation, to the initial licensing and development of projects each in the hundreds of millions of dollars, to thousands of new jobs. The gaming companies in Indiana have now come down to earth as a mature set of businesses that compete for leisure dollars with each other in and out of the state as well as with other leisure activities. The industry remains a vital force in the Indiana economy and continues to be an important driver of tax revenue, wages and capital investment.

If you couldn’t be a lawyer, what would you do for a living?

Film director. What a great and powerful way to communicate a story.

Who is your favorite fictional lawyer?

Denny Crane, “Boston Legal.”

What class do you wish you could have skipped in law school?

Criminal law. I still don’t know what mens rea is.

What are some tips for achieving a work/life balance?

Being a lawyer in private practice is very demanding. If you love doing that, it is all just one seamless life. If not, you should look for another profession.

What civic cause is the most important to you?

I sit on the United Way Capital Fund Committee which allocates grant dollars for new capital projects for United Way agencies. It is heartwarming to hear the stories of the great work these organizations do, and it is special to be a part of the decision-making process that can provide resources to those organizations to continue and enhance their missions to serve people in need.

What’s something about you not many people know?

I actually like our dog more than I let on.

What’s been the biggest change in the practice of law you’ve seen since you began?

Relationships were very stable when I began my career. Today, lawyers are more mobile and many clients find value in having multiple legal relationships.

What was the worst or most memorable job you had prior to becoming an attorney?

Most memorable: In college I worked at the Hungry Mind Bookstore, which was a decade ahead of its time and one of the first adopters in the country of the modern format of books, coffee shop and easy chairs as a gathering place for those who love books and learning.

Why do you think people often have negative stereotypes about lawyers?

We start from a disadvantage because we are often at the center of a dispute and either have to disagree with others or dwell on the negative. The party on the other side doesn’t like us because we are advocating against that party. Our own client may not have a great experience because the client doesn’t want to be in the dispute in the first place.

Is there a moment in your career you wish you could do over?

No regrets. I have enjoyed serving clients and helping to build successes for them.

We hear a lot about civility. Have you noticed a change in how attorneys treat each other since you began practicing?

I have the opportunity to interact with lawyers in many states. We are blessed with a group of lawyers in Indiana who are civil to each other and, by and large, whose word is their bond.

What’s your guilty pleasure?

Dark chocolate.

What’s something you’ve learned over the years that you wish you could go back in time and tell your younger self?

Patience.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It's a big fat black mark against the US that they radicalized a lot of these Afghan jihadis in the 80s to fight the soviets and then when they predictably got around to biting the hand that fed them, the US had to invade their homelands, install a bunch of corrupt drug kingpins and kleptocrats, take these guys and torture the hell out of them. Why for example did the US have to sodomize them? Dubya said "they hate us for our freedoms!" Here, try some of that freedom whether you like it or not!!! Now they got even more reasons to hate us-- lets just keep bombing the crap out of their populations, installing more puppet regimes, arming one faction against another, etc etc etc.... the US is becoming a monster. No wonder they hate us. Here's my modest recommendation. How about we follow "Just War" theory in the future. St Augustine had it right. How about we treat these obvious prisoners of war according to the Geneva convention instead of torturing them in sadistic and perverted ways.

  2. As usual, John is "spot-on." The subtle but poignant points he makes are numerous and warrant reflection by mediators and users. Oh but were it so simple.

  3. ACLU. Way to step up against the police state. I see a lot of things from the ACLU I don't like but this one is a gold star in its column.... instead of fighting it the authorities should apologize and back off.

  4. Duncan, It's called the RIGHT OF ASSOCIATION and in the old days people believed it did apply to contracts and employment. Then along came title vii.....that aside, I believe that I am free to work or not work for whomever I like regardless: I don't need a law to tell me I'm free. The day I really am compelled to ignore all the facts of social reality in my associations and I blithely go along with it, I'll be a slave of the state. That day is not today......... in the meantime this proposed bill would probably be violative of 18 usc sec 1981 that prohibits discrimination in contracts... a law violated regularly because who could ever really expect to enforce it along the millions of contracts made in the marketplace daily? Some of these so-called civil rights laws are unenforceable and unjust Utopian Social Engineering. Forcing people to love each other will never work.

  5. I am the father of a sweet little one-year-old named girl, who happens to have Down Syndrome. To anyone who reads this who may be considering the decision to terminate, please know that your child will absolutely light up your life as my daughter has the lives of everyone around her. There is no part of me that condones abortion of a child on the basis that he/she has or might have Down Syndrome. From an intellectual standpoint, however, I question the enforceability of this potential law. As it stands now, the bill reads in relevant part as follows: "A person may not intentionally perform or attempt to perform an abortion . . . if the person knows that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion solely because the fetus has been diagnosed with Down syndrome or a potential diagnosis of Down syndrome." It includes similarly worded provisions abortion on "any other disability" or based on sex selection. It goes so far as to make the medical provider at least potentially liable for wrongful death. First, how does a medical provider "know" that "the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion SOLELY" because of anything? What if the woman says she just doesn't want the baby - not because of the diagnosis - she just doesn't want him/her? Further, how can the doctor be liable for wrongful death, when a Child Wrongful Death claim belongs to the parents? Is there any circumstance in which the mother's comparative fault will not exceed the doctor's alleged comparative fault, thereby barring the claim? If the State wants to discourage women from aborting their children because of a Down Syndrome diagnosis, I'm all for that. Purporting to ban it with an unenforceable law, however, is not the way to effectuate this policy.

ADVERTISEMENT