Leadership in Law 2014: Alan A. Levin

Managing partner, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis • Indiana University Maurer School of Law, 1982

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
15col-Levin.jpg Alan A. Levin (IL photo/Eric Learned)

In the 16 years Alan A. Levin has served as Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s managing partner, he has guided the law firm’s transformation from primarily an Indiana firm to a national one. The firm has expanded from six to 12 offices throughout the country, and gross revenue has jumped by more than 400 percent during his tenure. Alan’s management style focuses on building consensus and maintaining a collegial atmosphere within the law firm. He is also known as one of the state’s premiere employee benefits lawyers.

Barnes & Thornburg has continued to expand in tough economic times. What are some key factors that drive growth?

In order to achieve growth in tough times, it is necessary for the firm to stay entrepreneurial and look for opportunities in our current markets as well as new markets. In addition, conservative fiscal management provides the resources that are necessary for such expansion.

How has employee benefits law changed since you started practicing?

Employee benefits laws have changed substantially since I started practicing. Congress continues to tinker with the rules, creating opportunities for lawyers, but it also makes these programs less cost effective for the employers/sponsors.

Who is your favorite fictional lawyer?

Saul Goodman from “Breaking Bad.” Saul is my favorite fictional lawyer for entertainment value purposes only. He could also be used as a reason for someone not to join the profession.

What was the worst or most memorable job you had prior to becoming an attorney?

Before I attended law school, I was a teaching tennis professional and managed tennis clubs. While substantially divergent from the practice of law, there are similarities in developing communication skills and creating comfort with students and/or clients.

What’s something you’ve learned over the years that you wish you could go back in time and tell your younger self?

In order to be successful at whatever you do, it is important that you always be a good listener and show a great deal of patience. In my earlier life, I probably could have benefited from slowing down to make sure I fully captured all the issues and considerations around me before making decisions.

What are some tips for achieving a work/life balance?

The key for a work/life balance is time management and discipline. This balance only occurs if you plan ahead and stick to the time that you are going to make yourself available for family, work and other activities.

Why do you think people often have negative stereotypes about lawyers?

The lawyers are viewed negatively by the public because they are viewed as creating barriers and additional complexity in solving problems. Hence, it is my view that a lawyer will only be successful if the lawyer is viewed as a problem solver or a guide in helping the client achieve his or her objectives.

What civic cause is the most important to you?

There are really two civic causes that are very important to me. I have been very involved in the Christel House Academies from their inception. I also have received a great deal of gratification from the work that is done by The Indianapolis Foundation and the Central Indiana Community Foundation, for which I have been fortunate enough to be a trustee for the last nine years.

What’s been the biggest change in the practice of law you’ve seen?

Obviously, the biggest change in the practice of law since I started is the technology. While technology makes it easier to practice law, it also requires the practice of law to be at a much faster pace which, in turn, requires greater focus and concentration.

Is there a moment in your career you wish you could do over?

I have been very fortunate in my legal career and there are not many things that I would desire to do over. However, I remember clearly a client meeting that I was scheduled to attend 30 years ago in which I jotted down the wrong address and showed up to meet with a disgruntled client an hour and 15 minutes late.

What class do you wish you could have skipped in law school?

Secured transactions was probably the class I wish I could have skipped in law school. The class just was not as interesting as the cases that were read for constitutional law and criminal procedure.

What’s something about you not many people know?

I do not think many people know that my father was also a lawyer and ultimately became a judge. He was my role model which led me to choose the profession.

We hear a lot about civility. Have you noticed a change in how attorneys treat each other since you began practicing?

With few exceptions, I have been fortunate that the lawyers that I have had relationships with have been good. Perhaps, my answer would be different if I was a litigator.

If you couldn’t be a lawyer, what would you do for a living?

If I was not a lawyer, I would probably find myself as a teacher or a professor. Due to my love of sports, there could be some coaching involved as well.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.