Leadership in Law 2014: John Z. Huang

Associate, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis • Notre Dame Law School, 2007

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share


15col-Huang.jpg John Z. Huang (IL Photo/ Eric Learned)

John Z. Huang joined Bose McKinney & Evans LLP in 2013 as a civil litigator after working in the public and private sector as a lawyer and educator. He began his legal career as a law clerk for Indiana Justice Frank Sullivan, who cites among John’s professional attributes his intelligence, warm personality and ethical standards. Colleagues describe him as a values-driven leader.

John believes every child deserves an excellent education, and he continues to commit significant personal and professional energies to achieving that goal.

Before becoming a law clerk on the Indiana Supreme Court, you had no prior relationship to Indianapolis. What made you stay?

After my clerkship ended in 2009, I was grateful to gain significant hands-on experience handling a docket of 30 civil cases at one time as assistant corporation counsel with the City of Indianapolis Corporation Counsel. I have been fortunate to have been involved in significant cases with the city, at the Department of Education, and now at Bose McKinney & Evans. I have enjoyed the collegiality and the accessibility of the legal community in Indianapolis.

What was the worst or most memorable job you had prior to becoming an attorney?

My most memorable job was serving as a third grade teacher in inner-city Los Angeles for two years as a Teach for America corps member. It was the toughest two years of my professional career, but I learned so much about working hard, overcoming challenges, perseverance and having faith.

You also have worked for the Indiana Department of Education and Lighthouse Academies, a charter school management organization. Why have you chosen education as a place to put your efforts?

I am interested in education because I love working with and teaching children and young adults, and I believe that a well-rounded, balanced education empowers all Americans to achieve their God-given potential and strengthens who we are as a people.

What is the most important lesson you learned from your mentor?

Legal writing should be succinct and easy enough for a non-lawyer to understand.

What’s something about you not many people know?

I am a fierce competitor when it comes to sports, especially basketball.

Why practice in the area of law that you do?

I practice general civil litigation because of the variety of interesting legal issues that I get to learn about and think about on a daily basis, because it allows me to utilize my interest and strength in legal research and writing, and because of the profound positive impact that civil litigation can have on individuals and on society as a whole.     

Who is your favorite fictional lawyer?

My favorite fictional lawyer is Atticus Finch because of his moral courage, integrity, and his steadfast belief that all men should be treated equally under the law.  

What civic cause is the most important to you?

For me, the most important civic cause is providing access to a quality education for all children here in Indianapolis, in Indiana and across the country.  I believe in empowering all sectors of society to contribute to this cause.  

If you couldn’t be a lawyer, what would you do for a living?

If I couldn’t be lawyer, I would probably be a combination of a Christian counselor, a youth basketball coach, and an adjunct law professor and legal writer/contributor to various media outlets.  

What are some tips for achieving a work/life balance?

Try to leave work at a designated time every day so that you set aside a certain amount of time each day to spend with family; spend the weekend doing things you enjoy; stay physically active.

Why do you think people often have negative stereotypes about lawyers?

I believe some of it has to do with the way lawyers are portrayed and glorified in the popular media.  In addition, having a law degree does confer a certain amount of status, power and influence, and we as lawyers have to be constantly aware of exercising our influence wisely and ethically.  

If you could meet and spend the day with one lawyer from history, who would it be and why?

I would love to spend one day with Abraham Lincoln, and ask him how his legal career helped him become the courageous and wise leader he was, and how it helped him navigate the Civil War and make so many tough decisions in such a turbulent time in our country’s history.   

Is there a moment in your career you wish you could do over?

As a summer intern in law school, I turned down an assignment from the executive director of the organization I was interning for because I didn’t have an interest in the topic. Bad mistake! I quickly learned my lesson.   

What class do you wish you could have skipped in law school?

Federal Income Tax, which was a graduation requirement at the time.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Especially I would like to see all the republican voting patriotic good ole boys to stop and understand that the wars they have been volunteering for all along (especially the past decade at least) have not been for God & Jesus etc no far from it unless you think George Washington's face on the US dollar is god (and we know many do). When I saw the movie about Chris Kyle, I thought wow how many Hoosiers are just like this guy, out there taking orders to do the nasty on the designated bad guys, sometimes bleeding and dying, sometimes just serving and coming home to defend a system that really just views them as reliable cannon fodder. Maybe if the Christians of the red states would stop volunteering for the imperial legions and begin collecting welfare instead of working their butts off, there would be a change in attitude from the haughty professorial overlords that tell us when democracy is allowed and when it isn't. To come home from guarding the borders of the sandbox just to hear if they want the government to protect this country's borders then they are racists and bigots. Well maybe the professorial overlords should gird their own loins for war and fight their own battles in the sandbox. We can see what kind of system this really is from lawsuits like this and we can understand who it really serves. NOT US.... I mean what are all you Hoosiers waving the flag for, the right of the president to start wars of aggression to benefit the Saudis, the right of gay marriage, the right for illegal immigrants to invade our country, and the right of the ACLU to sue over displays of Baby Jesus? The right of the 1 percenters to get richer, the right of zombie banks to use taxpayer money to stay out of bankruptcy? The right of Congress to start a pissing match that could end in WWIII in Ukraine? None of that crud benefits us. We should be like the Amish. You don't have to go far from this farcical lawsuit to find the wise ones, they're in the buggies in the streets not far away....

  2. Moreover, we all know that the well heeled ACLU has a litigation strategy of outspending their adversaries. And, with the help of the legal system well trained in secularism, on top of the genuinely and admittedly secular 1st amendment, they have the strategic high ground. Maybe Christians should begin like the Amish to withdraw their services from the state and the public and become themselves a "people who shall dwell alone" and foster their own kind and let the other individuals and money interests fight it out endlessly in court. I mean, if "the people" don't see how little the state serves their interests, putting Mammon first at nearly every turn, then maybe it is time they wake up and smell the coffee. Maybe all the displays of religiosity by American poohbahs on down the decades have been a mask of piety that concealed their own materialistic inclinations. I know a lot of patriotic Christians don't like that notion but I entertain it more and more all the time.

  3. If I were a judge (and I am not just a humble citizen) I would be inclined to make a finding that there was no real controversy and dismiss them. Do we allow a lawsuit every time someone's feelings are hurt now? It's preposterous. The 1st amendment has become a sword in the hands of those who actually want to suppress religious liberty according to their own backers' conception of how it will serve their own private interests. The state has a duty of impartiality to all citizens to spend its judicial resources wisely and flush these idiotic suits over Nativity Scenes down the toilet where they belong... however as Christians we should welcome them as they are the very sort of persecution that separates the sheep from the wolves.

  4. What about the single mothers trying to protect their children from mentally abusive grandparents who hide who they truly are behind mounds and years of medication and have mentally abused their own children to the point of one being in jail and the other was on drugs. What about trying to keep those children from being subjected to the same abuse they were as a child? I can understand in the instance about the parent losing their right and the grandparent having raised the child previously! But not all circumstances grant this being OKAY! some of us parents are trying to protect our children and yes it is our God given right to make those decisions for our children as adults!! This is not just black and white and I will fight every ounce of this to get denied

  5. Mr Smith the theory of Christian persecution in Indiana has been run by the Indiana Supreme Court and soundly rejected there is no such thing according to those who rule over us. it is a thought crime to think otherwise.