ILNews

Leadership in Law 2014: Clifford R. Whitehead

Associate, Bowers Harrison LLP, Evansville • Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, 2009

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

15col-Whitehead.jpg Clifford R. Whitehead (Photo/David Greene, DIA Photography)

Clifford R. Whitehead has been with Bowers Harrison for less than two years, but he has already helped the firm grow. The commercial litigator is active in the Evansville Bar Association, serving in several capacities including the employment law and young lawyers sections and with the diversity outreach committee. Before joining the firm, Cliff was a deputy prosecutor in Marion County and worked in the Office of Corporation Counsel in Indianapolis. Cliff believes it’s important for young attorneys to recognize they don’t know everything, so they must ask the right questions at the right time – and then absorb those answers.

You grew up wanting to be a doctor, but now you’re a lawyer. What made you enter the law?

Being a lawyer gives me the freedom to work on a wide variety of topics, and as a doctor, it seems that you are encouraged to specialize in just one area in the world of medicine.

When you were in law school, you were honored for performing more than 250 hours of pro bono work. How did you find time as a law student – and now as an attorney – to volunteer so many hours?

Lots of late nights at Starbucks.

On a related note, what are some tips for achieving a work/life balance?

Prioritizing what really matters in life.

If you could meet and spend the day with one lawyer from history, who would it be and why?

Thomas Jefferson. I would want to pick his brain on what did not make it into the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and why.

Why practice in the area of law that you do?

Commercial litigation allows me to do all the legal writing I could ever want, which I like, and still presents some in-court opportunities, which I enjoy.

What civic cause is the most important to you?

Ark Child Care Center in Evansville. It recognizes that life can be stressful, and during those times, it is important that families have a place to go for support.

Is there a moment in your career you wish you could do over?

Just one? In my first closing argument as an intern for the prosecutor’s office, I completely lost my train of thought in the middle of speaking and simply sat down. Thankfully, my co-counsel picked up where I left off and finished the argument.

What is the most important lesson you learned from your mentor?

Slow down, although I am still working on it.

Who is your favorite fictional lawyer?

In the words of the great Denny Crane, “Denny Crane.”

If you couldn’t be a lawyer, what would you do for a living?

Teach history and coach tennis at a high school.

What’s something about you not many people know?

I’d rather listen than talk.

Why do you think people often have negative stereotypes about lawyers?

Because lawyers quibble with every word people say.

What class do you wish you could have skipped in law school?

Family law.

What was the worst or most memorable job you had prior to becoming an attorney?

Cleaning mobile homes for my dad after people had lived in them.

What’s your guilty pleasure?

Watching Harvey Specter on the TV show “Suits.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT