ILNews

Opinions May 15, 2014

May 15, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The following Indiana Tax Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday:
Hoosier Roll Shop Services, LLC v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
49T10-1104-TA-29
Tax. Grants summary judgment in favor of Hoosier Roll and against the Department of State Revenue. Finds Hoosier Roll produces other tangible personal property when it grinds and calibrates its customers’ work rolls.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Riviera Plaza Investments, LLC and Haresh Shah v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
02A03-1308-MF-323
Mortgage foreclosure.  Affirms summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo with regard to Riviera and enters judgment in favor of Wells Fargo and against Shah in the ongoing collection and foreclosure proceedings against Riviera and Shah. The trial court properly granted Wells Fargo’s motion for summary judgment against Riviera and its determination that Shah was liable under the terms of the guaranty is not clearly erroneous.

J.H. v. J.K. (NFP)
1A03-1311-JP-459
Juvenile. Affirms order that father pay $70 per month toward the college expenses of his 19-year-old daughter.

Rayterrion Wheeler v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1310-CR-391
Criminal. Affirms murder conviction.

Rick Delks v. State of Indiana (NFP)
84A01-1309-PC-416
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

In re the Paternity of D.M.Y.: M.S.R. v. B.Y. (NFP)
34A04-1310-JP-504
Juvenile. Affirms the determination of Michael S. Robinson’s child support arrearage.

Jason Keel v. April Najdowski (NFP)
29A02-1305-DR-463
Domestic relation. Affirms denial of Keel’s petition for reinstatement of his parenting time.

Thomas M. Slaats v. Sally E. Slaats n/k/a Sally E. Jaggers-Weber (NFP)
87A01-1311-DR-503
Domestic relation. Affirms modification of father’s child support obligation.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline Thursday. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana decisions by IL deadline.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. That comment on this e-site, which reports on every building, courtroom or even insignificant social movement by beltway sycophants as being named to honor the yet-quite-alive former chief judge, is truly laughable!

  2. Is this a social parallel to the Mosby prosecutions in Baltimore? Progressive ideology ever seeks Pilgrims to burn at the stake. (I should know.)

  3. The Conour embarrassment is an example of why it would be a good idea to NOT name public buildings or to erect monuments to "worthy" people until AFTER they have been dead three years, at least. And we also need to stop naming federal buildings and roads after a worthless politician whose only achievement was getting elected multiple times (like a certain Congressman after whom we renamed the largest post office in the state). Also, why have we renamed BOTH the Center Township government center AND the new bus terminal/bum hangout after Julia Carson?

  4. Other than a complete lack of any verifiable and valid historical citations to back your wild context-free accusations, you also forget to allege "ate Native American children, ate slave children, ate their own children, and often did it all while using salad forks rather than dinner forks." (gasp)

  5. "So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)" Well, you know, we're just following in the footsteps of our founders who raped women, raped slaves, raped children, maimed immigrants, sold children, stole property, broke promises, broke apart families, killed natives... You know, good God fearing down home Christian folk! :/

ADVERTISEMENT