ILNews

Simon sues insurance companies over fatal escalator accident

Scott Olson
June 27, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. has filed suit against two insurance companies in an attempt to recoup damages relating to an escalator accident at Circle Centre mall in 2009 that led to the death of a Texas FFA delegate.

Simon, along with its Circle Centre Mall LLC entity, is suing Schaumburg, Ill.-based Zurich American Insurance Co. and Greensburg, Pa.-based Old Republic Insurance Co. in Marion Superior Court for unspecified damages.

The two firms insured escalator servicer Schindler Elevator Corp. at the time of the fall in October 2009. Police reports at the time said Philip Caler, a Texas FFA delegate in Indianapolis for the agricultural organization’s national convention, suffered critical injuries when he fell about 40 feet from an escalator near the third floor of the mall.

Caler, 20, died in September 2013 from his injuries, which included damage to his spine and brain.

In 2011, Caler’s parents filed suit against Simon, the mall, and the escalator company, among others, seeking damages due to their negligence, according to Simon’s complaint against the insurance companies.

Simon and Circle Centre settled the suit in July 2013 with help from their insurance company, XL Insurance America Inc. But Simon and Circle Centre claim in their complaint against Zurich and Old Republic that the two insurance companies failed to follow through on promises that they also would provide coverage to help with losses.

“As a result, Circle Center and Simon have been forced to institute this action to recover what should have been routine payments under the applicable policies,” their lawyer, Gregory A. Neibarger of Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, wrote in the complaint.

Reached by phone, Neibarger declined to comment further. Representatives of Zurich and Old Republic did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Indianapolis Business Journal on Friday.

Simon and Circle Centre are suing for breach of contract and bad faith.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Bob Leonard killed two people named Jennifer and Dion Longworth. There were no Smiths involved.

  2. Being on this journey from the beginning has convinced me the justice system really doesn't care about the welfare of the child. The trial court judge knew the child belonged with the mother. The father having total disregard for the rules of the court. Not only did this cost the mother and child valuable time together but thousands in legal fees. When the child was with the father the mother paid her child support. When the child was finally with the right parent somehow the father got away without having to pay one penny of child support. He had to be in control. Since he withheld all information regarding the child's welfare he put her in harms way. Mother took the child to the doctor when she got sick and was totally embarrassed she knew nothing regarding the medical information especially the allergies, The mother texted the father (from the doctors office) and he replied call his attorney. To me this doesn't seem like a concerned father. Seeing the child upset when she had to go back to the father. What upset me the most was finding out the child sleeps with him. Sometimes in the nude. Maybe I don't understand all the rules of the law but I thought this was also morally wrong. A concerned parent would allow the child to finish the school year. Say goodbye to her friends. It saddens me to know the child will not have contact with the sisters, aunts, uncles and the 87 year old grandfather. He didn't allow it before. Only the mother is allowed to talk to the child. I don't think now will be any different. I hope the decision the courts made would've been the same one if this was a member of their family. Someday this child will end up in therapy if allowed to remain with the father.

  3. Ok attorney Straw ... if that be a good idea ... And I am not saying it is ... but if it were ... would that be ripe prior to her suffering an embarrassing remand from the Seventh? Seems more than a tad premature here soldier. One putting on the armor should not boast liked one taking it off.

  4. The judge thinks that she is so cute to deny jurisdiction, but without jurisdiction, she loses her immunity. She did not give me any due process hearing or any discovery, like the Middlesex case provided for that lawyer. Because she has refused to protect me and she has no immunity because she rejected jurisdiction, I am now suing her in her district.

  5. Sam Bradbury was never a resident of Lafayette he lived in rural Tippecanoe County, Thats an error.

ADVERTISEMENT