ILNews

Sidebars: Bloomington eatery’s Cajun food leaves diners satisfied

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SidebarsEditor’s Note: Sidebars reviews and rates eateries lawyers may enjoy visiting when working at courthouses throughout Indiana. Jennifer offers this issue’s review.

I love working with other lawyers from other firms on cases. It gives you new perspectives on how to approach and prepare for a case, and it creates new friendships. I have had the pleasure to work with Frost Brown Todd lawyer Tom Farlow on a few cases in the past, but a recent case has led us to spend more time working together. Since it is a case in Bloomington, we spend some time in the car together. While Tom is a great lawyer, he also happens to be the most passive-aggressive backseat driver I have ever met. He doesn’t say “look out” or “don’t get over,” rather he jerks his head around as I attempt a lane change. If he verbalizes his concerns, it is matter-of-fact like. “Can you believe how some people stop for red lights like the car in front of us?” really means “SLOW THE %#$& DOWN! WE ARE GOING TO DIE IF YOU DON’T START BRAKING!!!”

But Tom does know how to pick a place to eat. After some depositions in Bloomington, we dined at the Uptown Café right off the courthouse square. The restaurant dons a comfortably upscale décor. It was busy, which is always a good sign especially when the campus is out for summer break. We were quickly seated and served.

The menu brags, by its selection, a Cajun pride but has other options. For appetizers, one may choose from a Rock shrimp and calamari fritti with mango coconut cocktail sauce and chipotle sour cream. There is the Cajun liver pâté or Cuban black bean soup. A handful of salads are offered with house-made dressings. The salad offerings include a Chinese chicken salad, the traditional Caesar, or a mesclun salad that includes 14 organic baby lettuces topped with gorgonzola cheese, baby tomatoes, onions, olives and walnuts. For any salad you may add toppings like chicken, salmon or jumbo shrimp for a little extra.

We went straight for the entrees. Tom ordered the special – fried perch and fries. It was perfectly battered so it didn’t mask the fish. He was not passive-aggressive when it came to the fish. He aggressively gave it a thumbs-up. I loved my Louisiana hot pepper chicken. Cajun-spiced chicken breast cutlets smothered in a cheesy, hot pepper cream sauce with basmati rice. All I need to say is it was scrumptious. However, once you see the menu, decision making will be tough. There is pot roast, crawfish étouffée, red beans and rice, gumbo of the day and more. On the sandwich side of the menu, more temptations await: shrimp tacos, Ararat chicken pita (sliced chicken marinated in olive oil, rosemary and garlic, placed inside a warm pita with aioli, lettuce and a tomato-onion-cucumber relish), a Veg Head Sandwich (on which you can ask for, ironically, bacon), and a Cajun meatloaf sandwich. Finally, if you feel like breakfast fare, they offer regular items such as a potato omelet or eggs and bacon, but also a unique creme brulee French toast – slices of a baguette on top of a custard infused with vanilla. Seriously? Yes.

If our entrees are indicators of how the other selections will taste, any selection will satisfy. While some of the entrees sound heavy, we left sated but not overly so. As I drove back to Indy with my jumpy passenger, we laughed about how I would be making fun of him in this upcoming article. Fortunately, he did not object, but we’ll see after he reads it in print.

Go and enjoy a nice lunch and take a friend, co-counsel or as I did, both.•

Uptown Café, 102 E. Kirkwood Ave., Bloomington, IN. http://the-uptown.com

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn & Paul in Indianapolis, focusing on criminal defense. Both enjoy a good meal with colleagues and friends. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the authors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  2. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  3. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

  4. Why in the world would someone need a person to correct a transcript when a realtime court reporter could provide them with a transcript (rough draft) immediately?

  5. This article proved very enlightening. Right ahead of sitting the LSAT for the first time, I felt a sense of relief that a score of 141 was admitted to an Indiana Law School and did well under unique circumstances. While my GPA is currently 3.91 I fear standardized testing and hope that I too will get a good enough grade for acceptance here at home. Thanks so much for this informative post.

ADVERTISEMENT