Woman’s burglary conspiracy conviction affirmed

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals Friday affirmed the conviction of a correctional officer who played a role in arranging the burglary of a safe from a friend’s home.

The court ruled that there was sufficient evidence and that the trial court properly denied a motion for a mistrial in Jennifer L. Patch v. State of Indiana, 68A05-1309-CR-460.

A jury in Randolph Superior Court convicted Jennifer Patch of leaving a window open at the woman’s house and arranging for another person to enter the house and remove the safe while Patch and the victim were at a restaurant, according to the record.

Patch moved for a mistrial, arguing that a prosecutor had committed misconduct by talking with witnesses and counsel during a break while a separation of witnesses was in place. Judge Melissa May wrote for the panel that such orders generally apply to witnesses and not counsel or judges.

“The evidence is sufficient to convict Patch of Class B felony conspiracy to commit burglary, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Patch’s motion for a mistrial," May wrote. "Accordingly, we affirm."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer