ABA releases tool to assess cognitive impairment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Working in a profession that prizes intellectual agility, lawyers can be especially sensitive to questions about their mental faculties.

Legal professionals tend to tie their sense of self to their cognitive function. They think of themselves as being well-educated problem-solvers who are trained to help others. Above all, they value intellectual stimulation.

However, the stressful sedentary lifestyle that typically accompanies a career in the law also puts lawyers at risk for cognitive impairment. And while lawyers can be hurt when someone points out they have packed on a few pounds, they can be devastated when a colleague tells them they are not fully comprehending their cases or their advice to clients is problematic.

To help attorneys who are concerned about the intellectual fitness of another lawyer or judge, the American Bar Association has recently released a cognitive assessment tool. In 2008, the ABA’s Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs created what became the Senior Lawyer Committee, the group that led the work on developing the assessment instrument.

The “Working Paper on Cognitive Impairment and Cognitive Decline” is a questionnaire designed to give attorneys guidance in determining whether a partner or friend is just having a bad month or is suffering from something more serious. It also provides recommendations for talking to a colleague who is exhibiting troublesome behavior.

Terry Harrell mug Harrell

“This is not a diagnostic tool,” explained Terry Harrell, executive director of the Indiana Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. “It’s a tool to determine 

if you need to ask someone to have an evaluation” by a medical doctor.

Harrell assisted in the development of the cognitive questionnaire when she served as co-chair of the ABA CoLAP Senior Lawyer Committee. She will become chair of the ABA Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs in August.

The assessment tool was created in response to the rise in calls to lawyer assistance programs across the country from attorneys concerned about colleagues’ cognitive fumbles.

Harrell noted inquires about mental acuity remain a small percentage of the calls that assistance programs receive. Problems with depression and substance abuse far outpace cognitive impairments, but concerns about intellectual health are the fastest-growing segment of all calls.

Across the United States, lawyer assistance programs reported a 14-percent increase in cognitive inquires between 2010 and 2012, Harrell said.

Normal aging or a symptom?

Tip-of-the-tongue moments become more common as people age. The instances where someone’s name does not quickly come to mind or having to look a little longer for the car keys are the kinds of things that naturally happen when someone gets older.

Even as their mental abilities slow, people can still remain active and do their jobs very well, said Dr. Ann Marie Hake, associate professor of clinical neurology at Indiana University School of Medicine. The problem arises when those tip-of-the-tongue moments become more persistent and more frequent that they interfere with normal activities.

hake-ann Hake

Not recognizing family members, substituting the wrong word, getting lost near home and dramatic personality changes are possible signs of cognitive 

impairment, Harrell said.

The ABA’s cognitive assessment tool gives a picture of what is happening by having concerned colleagues put their observations on paper. Writing down any shortcomings in job performance along with changes in appearance or behavior, Harrell said, enables attorneys to better see how their partners and associates are functioning at the office.

Cognitive decline is not limited to senior citizens. Medical conditions, such as diabetes; prescription drugs; emotional turmoil caused by family troubles or even lack of sleep can interfere with the efficient function of a young or middle-aged lawyer’s brain.

Not the end of a career

Certainly, the practice of law can overwork a brain. Attorneys cannot control the pace of the work, so maybe one month they have multiple hearings and briefings to prepare which forces them to forgo sleep and a healthy diet while the next month, the list of things to do shrinks considerably.

“Part of the wear and tear of being a lawyer is that you have a variety of intense things to do that come on a regular, irregular basis,” said Jim Roth, chair of the Indiana State Bar Association Senior Lawyers Section.

Ironically, Hake said, while certain parts of practicing law can put attorneys at risk for cognitive impairment, other parts can diminish that risk.

Sitting all day, working in a high-pressure environment is not good for either the body or the brain, she said. But the high level of education attorneys have plus the amount of intellectual stimulation they get during the day actually exercises the brain in a good way.

Still, Roth questioned when slowing down cognitively becomes an impairment.

“What’s a problem?” he asked. “If you’re at 90-percent capacity of what you used to be, is that a problem?”

He then voiced what is likely a common fear of being told to quit practicing law rather than being allowed to continue doing what you love. He proposed instituting some type of mentor program that can help older attorneys do their work as lawyers. Someone to assist with the workload or to bounce ideas off can provide the needed boost to enable an attorney to keep serving clients.cognitive-facts.jpg
Hake agreed, saying she is not an advocate of retirement. With individuals who do suffer from degenerative dementia, the cognitive decline is usually gradual and with the proper medication and support, they can still contribute.

“These guys and gals have a lot of experience and a lot of knowledge,” Hake said. “Why put that to waste?”

Having a conversation

Doing the assessment is not easy. First the concerned attorney must identify the best people to speak with about the worrisome colleague. Ideally, it should be people who work closely with the colleague and care enough about him or her to be honest in their observations, Harrell said.

Second, the concerned attorney must have a conversation with the colleague.

Mike Long, attorney counselor with the Oregon Attorney Assistance Program, conceded talking to another attorney about his or her mental decline can be tremendously uncomfortable. Compounding the situation is that lawyers usually do not have any experience talking about cognitive problems, and questions about intellect can feel like a personal attack.

Long, who has counseled attorneys for more than 20 years, played a key role in developing the ABA cognitive assessment tool.

Although talking with a lawyer who shows signs of cognitive impairment is difficult, Long pointed out ignoring the problem can have severe consequences. Clients can be hurt, the law firm could get slapped with a malpractice lawsuit and ethical issues could sprout. All this could lead to the impaired attorney, who was once a well-respected member of the legal community, having his or her career ended by a disciplinary action.

Long advised the conversation should be objective and detail what behaviors and work habits have been observed that are causing concerns. Attorneys should be specific with the colleague, noting situations, for example, where appointments were forgotten or court dates missed. Speculation and hearsay should be avoided.

The ABA working paper drew praise from Hake who said the committee did a good job describing the signs and symptoms of possible impairment.

She also encouraged attorneys to be proactive and address any problems rather than dismissing them. The cause of a cognitive impairment might be reversible, but it should be addressed early otherwise it might cause permanent damage. And, if the cause is not reversible, attorneys can take steps to protect their clients and preserve their reputations.

“People shouldn’t be afraid to get checked out and help others get checked out,” Hake said.•


  • Hope my money didn't fund that!
    If real money was spent on this study, what a shame. And if some air-head professor tries to use this to advance a career, pity the poor student. I am approaching a time that i (and others around me) should be vigilant. I don't think I'm anywhere near there yet, but seeing the subject I was looking forward to something I might use to look for some benchmarks. When finally finding my way to the hidden questionnaire all I could say to myself was...what a joke. Those are open and obvious signs of any impaired lawyer (or non-lawyer, for that matter), And if one needs a checklist to discern those tell-tale signs of impairment at any age, one shouldn't be practicing law. Another reason I don't regret dropping my ABA membership some number of years ago.
  • hmmmm
    I work with some older lawyers in the 70s, 80s, and they are sharp as tacks compared to the foggy minded, undisciplined, inexperienced, listless & aimless "youths" being churned out by the diploma mill law schools by the tens of thousands. A client is generally lucky to land a lawyer who has decided to stay in practice a long time. Young people shouldn't kid themselves. Experience is golden especially in something like law. When you start out as a new lawyer you are about as powerful as a babe in the cradle. Whereas the silver halo of age usually crowns someone who can strike like thunder.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Especially I would like to see all the republican voting patriotic good ole boys to stop and understand that the wars they have been volunteering for all along (especially the past decade at least) have not been for God & Jesus etc no far from it unless you think George Washington's face on the US dollar is god (and we know many do). When I saw the movie about Chris Kyle, I thought wow how many Hoosiers are just like this guy, out there taking orders to do the nasty on the designated bad guys, sometimes bleeding and dying, sometimes just serving and coming home to defend a system that really just views them as reliable cannon fodder. Maybe if the Christians of the red states would stop volunteering for the imperial legions and begin collecting welfare instead of working their butts off, there would be a change in attitude from the haughty professorial overlords that tell us when democracy is allowed and when it isn't. To come home from guarding the borders of the sandbox just to hear if they want the government to protect this country's borders then they are racists and bigots. Well maybe the professorial overlords should gird their own loins for war and fight their own battles in the sandbox. We can see what kind of system this really is from lawsuits like this and we can understand who it really serves. NOT US.... I mean what are all you Hoosiers waving the flag for, the right of the president to start wars of aggression to benefit the Saudis, the right of gay marriage, the right for illegal immigrants to invade our country, and the right of the ACLU to sue over displays of Baby Jesus? The right of the 1 percenters to get richer, the right of zombie banks to use taxpayer money to stay out of bankruptcy? The right of Congress to start a pissing match that could end in WWIII in Ukraine? None of that crud benefits us. We should be like the Amish. You don't have to go far from this farcical lawsuit to find the wise ones, they're in the buggies in the streets not far away....

  2. Moreover, we all know that the well heeled ACLU has a litigation strategy of outspending their adversaries. And, with the help of the legal system well trained in secularism, on top of the genuinely and admittedly secular 1st amendment, they have the strategic high ground. Maybe Christians should begin like the Amish to withdraw their services from the state and the public and become themselves a "people who shall dwell alone" and foster their own kind and let the other individuals and money interests fight it out endlessly in court. I mean, if "the people" don't see how little the state serves their interests, putting Mammon first at nearly every turn, then maybe it is time they wake up and smell the coffee. Maybe all the displays of religiosity by American poohbahs on down the decades have been a mask of piety that concealed their own materialistic inclinations. I know a lot of patriotic Christians don't like that notion but I entertain it more and more all the time.

  3. If I were a judge (and I am not just a humble citizen) I would be inclined to make a finding that there was no real controversy and dismiss them. Do we allow a lawsuit every time someone's feelings are hurt now? It's preposterous. The 1st amendment has become a sword in the hands of those who actually want to suppress religious liberty according to their own backers' conception of how it will serve their own private interests. The state has a duty of impartiality to all citizens to spend its judicial resources wisely and flush these idiotic suits over Nativity Scenes down the toilet where they belong... however as Christians we should welcome them as they are the very sort of persecution that separates the sheep from the wolves.

  4. What about the single mothers trying to protect their children from mentally abusive grandparents who hide who they truly are behind mounds and years of medication and have mentally abused their own children to the point of one being in jail and the other was on drugs. What about trying to keep those children from being subjected to the same abuse they were as a child? I can understand in the instance about the parent losing their right and the grandparent having raised the child previously! But not all circumstances grant this being OKAY! some of us parents are trying to protect our children and yes it is our God given right to make those decisions for our children as adults!! This is not just black and white and I will fight every ounce of this to get denied

  5. Mr Smith the theory of Christian persecution in Indiana has been run by the Indiana Supreme Court and soundly rejected there is no such thing according to those who rule over us. it is a thought crime to think otherwise.