ILNews

MCBA to host membership drive

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Marion County Bar Association is continuing to advance its mission with a special event to reconnect with past members and welcome new members.

The organization will host a membership drive from 5:30 to 8 p.m. Sept. 4, at the Indianapolis Propylaeum, 1410 N. Delaware St., Indianapolis.

The event, MCBA Membership Drive: Advancing Our Future – Reclaiming Our Past, will provide an opportunity to network and learn about ways to help advance the association’s mission. Also, attendees can explore MCBA’s programs like mentoring students at Shortridge Magnet High School for Law and Public Policy students.

“Today, the MCBA seeks to encourage diversity in the Indianapolis legal community and promote truth, justice and fairness through education, professional development and community involvement,” said Cassandra Bentley McNair, association president. “In order to do that, the MCBA hopes to use the membership drive to raise awareness about the organization and encourage like-minded individuals to become active in its efforts.”

The membership drive is free but reservations are requested. RSVP by email to mcba@mcbaindy.org.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Recipe for disaster
    I see that the Congressional Black Caucus is attempting lead their constituents into agreement, in effect, with the MCBA's statement that thousands of police are targeting AA men, for murder, due to race. This well over the top statement, coupled to activists threatening to kill white cops, coupled to a new phone app that allegedly identifies the places where racist cops are found, is so very troubling. America, America, God shed His Grace on thee .... are we throwing it all away to make political points, points made in a fashion that may very well result in the assassination of some or our nation's finest, black and white? "Caught in the middle are blacks working in law enforcement. There were an estimated 55,267 African-Americans in local police departments and an additional 15,500 in sheriff’s departments in 2007, the latest information available from the Justice Department. “We’re called things like Uncle Toms and traitors to our community, in spite of the fact that we sympathize or we agree with the anger that our community holds, because we feel that same anger,” said Noel Leader, a retired New York City police sergeant who in 1995 co-founded an advocacy group, 100 Blacks In Law Enforcement Who Care." http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2014/12/11/black-officer-im-called-uncle-tom/ I must ask ..... will the MCBA recall, before someone is killed for such emotional rather than factual sentiments, the following incendiary statement that it recently issued: "“This situation is not just about the death of Michael Brown, but the thousands of other African-Americans who are disproportionately targeted and killed by police officers.”
    • Diversity calling
      If the MCBA wants to have a speaker in with a diverse viewpoint, and one that can really call a nation to action, and their association to a greater purpose, maybe even greater membership, certainly to greater relevance, then I humbly suggest this fine man, who brings an alternative perspective to the MCBA's call to street protest ala Rerguson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B092acMImJE
    • Almost mea culpa
      When I posted this I did not realize that the Marion County Bar Association was a group that historically defined itself by race, and in particular as follows: "The Marion County Bar Association is an affiliate chapter of the National Bar Association that has historically served the needs of African-American attorneys in the Indianapolis area since 1925. Today, the MCBA seeks to encourage diversity in the Indianapolis legal community ..." Had I known that history I likely would not have posted the comment below in response to its call for the following: “While we share in the public’s outrage, the MCBA does not condone the violence that a small minority of protesters have resorted to,” the association’s statement continued. “However, the majority of the protests have been peaceful, and we stand with those who are exercising their First Amendment rights to protest the actions of their government.” I wrongly assumed the MCBA to be a race neutral and fully integrated organization representing the majority of attorneys in Indy. My ignorance has been cured. Being white, racial preferences and set asides is not an option for me, and so it is not my default when thinking about other groups. I just assume full integration, as it is easy for me to do. I apologize if my comment came off as racially insensitive. It was not intended so, but rather was intended as a comment the wrongheadedness of the MCBA encouraging events like those taking place in Feguson in response to due process of the law and nearly sacred procedures dating back to Magna Carta. IMHO the results of grand jury failures to indict should not results in mass protests, and lawyers should not encourage the same. Change the law if need be, set up test cases, but mass protests based upon individual cases .... not causes, but individual cases ... lawyers of any color should not encourage, at least by my lights. It is a path toward lawlessness.
      • Seeking grants
        Will the MCBA be offering any mentoring in fomenting public protests over legal process that is seemingly unfair into full fledged riots and pre-Christmas looting?

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
      1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

      2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

      3. Low energy. Next!

      4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

      5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

      ADVERTISEMENT