ILNews

COA: Auditor complied with notice statutes in tax sale

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a 2013 order by a trial court that tax sale deeds be issued, agreeing that the Marion County auditor complied with the statutes dealing with notices surrounding tax sales.

Floor-Essence LLC was delinquent on property taxes on three adjacent parcels in Indianapolis. Lisa Thomason, the principal of the company, lived at a residence located on property adjacent to one of the delinquent properties. The auditor sent pre-tax sale notices by first class and certified mail; the properties were sold in 2011 to S & C Financial Group LLC. Post-tax sale notices were also sent to Floor-Essence as well as its attorney and occupants of the delinquent properties.

Thomason said she never received any notice and did not learn of the tax sale until a tenant informed her of it. The notices sent certified mail were returned to the auditor’s office, but the first-class mailed notices were not returned. She filed a lawsuit objecting to the sale; the trial court in October 2013 overruled Floor-Essence’s objections and ordered the tax sale deeds be issued.

The Court of Appeals affirmed in In re: The 2011 Marion County Tax Sale, Floor-Essence, LLC v. Marion County Auditor and Marion County Treasurer, 49A02-1311-MI-934, finding the trial court did not err in entering the order. The judges noted the auditor sent the required notices under Indiana statute and the company does not claim that the notices were not in substantial compliance with the statutory requirements. Thomason even testified that she was aware the taxes for at least one of the properties was delinquent.

“[We] find that the Auditor substantially complied with the statutes governing the notices and that the manner of service was reasonably calculated under all the circumstances to apprise Floor-Essence of the pendency of the action and afford it an opportunity to object,” Judge Elaine Brown wrote.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT