ILNews

Nothing boring about board games

Marilyn Odendahl
August 27, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Patrick Olmstead had prepared for his day away from the office by packing his tablet to check messages periodically and grabbing his keyboard just in case he had to draft a document.

However, the Greenwood attorney was more occupied that day with slabs of cardboard, dice, cards and miniature pieces. Dressed in a T-shirt that says “Jesus Loves You: But I’m his favorite,” Olmstead was at the 2014 Gen Con indulging in his passion for board games.

Tabletop games seem to lack the pizzazz of their flashy video counterparts but the low-tech pastime attracts legions of avid fans, as evidenced by the massive crowds that invade Indianapolis every year for the annual gaming convention.

gencon-olmstead-15col.jpg Greenwood attorney Patrick Olmstead, left, demonstrates how to play the card game Diamonds during the 2014 Gen Con. Many attorneys like Olmstead say they love to play tabletop games because the popular pastime gives them a break from practicing law and allows them to spend time with family and friends. (IL Photo/Marilyn Odendahl)

Attorneys, like Olmstead, number among the board gamers, often speaking about the designs and rules of the games with an infectious enthusiasm. The table

top contests give them the opportunity to forget about the law and instead focus on conquering the world, building railroads, settling new frontiers or outwitting flesh-eating monsters.

“Ultimately, I’m happy if I can play a game and have a good time,” Olmstead said.

Attorney and mediator Steve Spence combined his board-game hobby with his profession when he used a board game to teach mediation skills to students in his negotiation and alternative dispute resolution class at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.

He used the game Diplomacy, which requires players to make decisions about when to forge alliances and when to backstab opponents. The complex rules and time required to play may have hindered the game’s success at teaching the students, but Spence remains a fan.

He grew up playing chess, Stratego and Risk, and he noted playing the games does provide practice for his professional work. A mediator does not say or do something without a particular reason, he said, just like a chess player does not move a piece without a reason.

But his main reason for playing board games is the enjoyment it brings.

Olmstead caught the fever for board gaming when a former colleague took him to Gen Con in 2005. Playing games with other convention goers got him hooked, and he started his personal collection of games with The Settlers of Catan.

For the 2014 event, Olmstead spent part of his time volunteering in the Pick Up and Play room. Attendees could come to the room near the convention floor, open their new purchases or check out a classic from the library, and play. Olmstead helped gamers who had questions about the rules of a particular game or who needed an extra player.

Having changed into a bright orange T-shirt emblazoned with the word “VOLUNTEER,” Olmstead looked over the rows of people playing board games and talked about the correlation between the Pick Up and Play room and litigation.

“I think it’s great,” the attorney said. “If you’re a litigation attorney, it’s good training.” He explained teaching a random group of individuals a bunch of rules they are unfamiliar with is very similar to trying to sway a judge or jury to your side during a trial.

But what keeps him coming back to playing board games is the family time the activity brings. His wife, Julia, and their two daughters will switch off the television, gather around the table, and hang out.

“That’s what I like about gaming,” Olmstead said. “You turn everything off and you focus on spending time together.”

His sentiments are echoed by other attorneys.

Rachelle Ponist Harshman, associate at Patrick Olmstead Law, and her husband, Tippecanoe County Deputy Prosecutor Aaron Harshman, regularly welcome friends into their home for game night.

“I think it’s a productive way to spend time with people,” she said, explaining everyone at the table is involved in the game which creates a lot of laughter and a “joyful experience.”

Board games have always been a part of Ponist Harshman’s life. She would crowd with her girlfriends into the basement of her childhood home and play cards and board games all night. Since high school, board games have fostered key introductions.

She met her husband during moot court at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, and their first date was to a trivia event at a local bar. After graduation, her connections and friendships in board-gaming circles led her to Olmstead and eventually a job offer.

Aaron Harshman shares his wife’s enthusiasm. He described himself as a “bit of an evangelist” for board games, explaining he likes to play, he likes to teach others how to play, and he has even helped design a couple of tabletop contests.

The main element that attracts him to the low-tech gaming is the chance to be with friends. Board games, with their slower pace than video games, bring out the players’ personalities and require them to be thoughtful. And, they can be paused whenever the participants want to take a break.

John Lowery, attorney at Lee & Fairman LLP, saw the allure of board games when his two sons put down their video games to join him and his friends at the table. Lowery shares with a neighbor a collection of roughly 50 games that includes Acquire, Empire Builder and Executive Decision.

In high school, he enjoyed many rounds of Risk with his cross-country teammates and in college, while working as a law clerk, he spent a couple of nights each week huddled over a board game with friends. The competition and figuring out a strategy for winning kept him coming back.

Andrew Kanis, of Indianapolis, loves board games so much he is giving up the law. The solo practitioner, who has 700 games and has been a serious player since college, got his dream job when he saw a want ad from Panda Game Manufacturing.

It was not an impulsive move. Kanis has long wanted to work in the gaming industry but figured the only job openings would be for designers or artists. He now knows the industry needs account managers as well.

The social experience and the ability to interact with friends are his favorite aspects of board gaming, he said. Players of video games can be in different locations, but rolling the dice and moving pieces around a board requires all the players to be in the same room.

In the end, work did intrude on Olmstead’s gaming day, but in a good way. Someone at Gen Con chuckled at his “Jesus Loves You” T-shirt which led to a conversation and a new client.

Like Kanis, Olmstead has dreamed of working with the board-game industry. He is working to expand his practice to include legal representation for game designers and publishers. To be successful at adding a new practice area to his firm, Olmstead certainly has the love for the games, but he may need more catchy T-shirts.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT