ILNews

As season ends, lawyers look to revive interest in softball league

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It is time to hang up the cleats for another season.

On Sept. 29, the Indianapolis Lawyers’ Softball League played its final game of 2011. The Mudsharks, coached by Schultz & Pogue attorney J. Kirk LeBlanc, won the championship, defeating the team from Riley Bennett & Egloff, 23-11 in five innings.

Eight teams participated in the annual softball league this year, but diehard players say that they’d like to see more teams next season.

Donald Smith of Riley Bennett & Egloff has played 31 consecutive seasons with the league. At its high point in the 1980s, he said the league had 33 member teams, with some of the larger firms fielding multiple teams.
 

softball-15col.jpg Robert Brandt, attorney at Riley Bennett & Egloff, is the pitcher for the firm’s softball team. (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

“In the 2000s, teams began to drop out, and rarely do the big firms even field a team anymore,” Smith said. “It’s just one old-timer’s opinion, but it seems that as starting salaries skyrocketed, the newer attorneys – and more athletic ones – were required to bill more time. In turn, the newer attorneys were not as interested in spending Thursday nights on the softball diamonds, and the social aspects of the game seemed less important.”

These new attorneys may be missing out on a valuable networking opportunity, LeBlanc said, by not making time to participate.

“I think that’s one thing the younger generation needs to think about … they’re still wrapped up in the billable hour, but they need to realize you can have fun, too.”

Who plays, and why

Robert Brandt, pitcher for the Riley Bennett & Egloff team, said that in a profession that can sometimes create adversarial relationships, softball offers a chance for attorneys to get to know each other.

“It really is a good time, and it’s a good way to unwind a little bit,” Brandt said.

Today, LeBlanc plays because he loves the game. But that’s not how he started out.

“I started in 1998 when I was a law clerk, and really, when I was a law clerk, the partner I worked with just told me I had to play,” LeBlanc recalled.

At its heyday, requirements for tournament play were more rigid than they are today. Smith said that the league used to require that any member of a team playing in a tournament had to have taken the bar exam. But rules regarding team structure have been relaxed in an attempt to get more people to play.

Brandt said that nowadays, teams need to field only five lawyers or law students. And teams may be comprised of players from multiple firms. LeBlanc’s 14 players come from five or six different firms, he said.


leBlanc-kirk-mug.jpg LeBlanc

“I think there are attorneys out there that would love to play, but their feeling is that if they can’t put a team together, they can’t play,” LeBlanc said. But both he and Brandt said they would welcome inquires from anyone who wants to play. “We’ll plug them in, we’ll make the teams,” LeBlanc said.

There’s always next year

Asked if teams do any training or preparation in the off-season, Brandt chuckled.

“It really is kind of loosely organized, not in a bad sense, but the goal is to really just go out there and have some fun,” he said.

Indy Parks sets the regular-season and tournament schedules, Brandt explained, with games generally beginning in mid-May and continuing through August. This year, because of an early-season storm that knocked out the lights at the Chuck Klein Softball Complex, the league was not able to play past dark, which caused its season to run a bit longer than normal. Games typically begin at the three-diamond complex at 6:30 p.m., with the last game beginning at 8:40 p.m.

Relaxed as its structure may be, the league still follows standards created by the National Softball Association.

“We kind of play a hybrid of the NSA rules, and (Indy Parks) allows us to do that because it’s a lawyers’ league and it’s the way it’s been done for 30 years,” Brandt said.

Both Brandt and LeBlanc said they hope more lawyers join them on the field next season. For more information about the Indianapolis Lawyers’ Softball League, contact LeBlanc at 317-262-1000 or at kleblanc@schultzpoguelaw.com, or Brandt at 317-636-8000 or at rbrandt@rbelaw.com.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT