ILNews

At new immigration clinic, 'We're all family'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

At its most basic level, Lafayette Urban Ministry's immigration services clinic is about family.

That notion was in the forefront of Jefferson High School senior Devon Wolfe's mind as he designed the logo for the newly launched clinic.

"The real motivation behind such immigration ... is it's more of a process about becoming family," Wolfe told the Journal & Courier. "As humans in such a big world, you really tend to lose touch, and then you look around and you realize we're all family. We're all here to help each other."

Last month, the Journal & Courier profiled the clinic when it received accreditation from the U.S. Justice Department's Board of Immigration Appeals.

Since then, the clinic has operated quietly, until Tuesday. That's the day LUM officials and supporters gathered for a grand opening — the first push to announce the clinic's services to the general public.

"We understand that those who are immigrants have a special bureaucratic challenge that many other travelers don't have," said Joe Micon, executive director. "Navigating that system takes an awful lot of knowledge, expertise and energy."

Under the leadership of program director Susan Brouillette, the clinic will provide confidential legal support to immigrant families. That includes determining eligibility for immigration benefits and connecting clients with other services, such as English classes or civics lessons.

That service will be offered on a sliding fee scale.

Brouillette spent 26 years working for former U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar, who dealt extensively with immigration issues.

"There are such a few number of clinics," Brouillette said. "People may be eligible for benefits and don't even know that they are. Or they don't even know there's help here, or maybe they're being stopped because they don't have the funds to go through the process."

The Census Bureau estimates there are 13,127 foreign-born residents in Tippecanoe County — about 8 percent of the total population — who are not U.S. citizens.

One of them is Diana Michel, 21, who was born in Mexico. Michel said she could have used LUM's immigration services clinic two years ago when she was preparing her deferred action application to gain temporary permission to remain in the U.S.

She faced more than $800 in application and attorney fees. Now a LUM volunteer, Michel wishes she'd had such a clinic to walk her through the process.

"It was very nerve-wracking," Michel said.

With the clinic, "they're giving you assurance, giving you the confidence to do things. If you have any doubt that you're going to be deported, or you're not doing something right, she has the knowledge — rather than somebody just getting things off the Internet."

Zach Szmara, a pastor of The Bridge Community Church, said his church opened a similar clinic four months ago in Logansport. The first clients, he said, were from Lafayette.

"I am just so excited (that) we can tell clients from Lafayette, 'Hey, there is a great clinic serving your needs right here in Lafayette,' " Szmara said.

Even with the new Lafayette clinic, there is more work to be done across the state and country, Szmara said. More than 300,000 immigrants are in Indiana.

"There are only 15 accredited legal representatives in the state of Indiana at 12 different sites," Szmara said. "If we all did a full caseload, it would take us 56 years to meet the need."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT