ILNews

Attorney faces theft and forgery charges

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indianapolis attorney and accountant has been charged with theft and forgery after an investigation revealed the attorney had misappropriated nearly $600,000 in funds from a guardianship account and a family trust account.

The Marion County Prosecutor’s Office says Stacy H. Sheedy, 51, made questionable withdrawals on the estate of an elderly woman who is in a nursing home diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Sheedy was appointed guardian of the woman’s estate in May 2010 and received funds from another guardian in December 2010. Sheedy allegedly did not deposit all of the money into the proper accounts and there were multiple questionable withdrawals. She was removed as guardian in April 2011 and ordered to repay $120,000.

During the course of the investigation into Sheedy’s conduct in the guardianship case, investigators discovered other suspicious transactions stemming from Sheedy’s role as trustee of a family trust. In November 2007, Sheedy became the trustee of a family trust valued at nearly $500,000; the trust now has a present value of $168. When family members questioned why they were no longer receiving brokerage statements from the account, Sheedy told them she had invested the funds in a bond fund. She provided them with statements from the “Wealth Council Indiana Small Cap Bond” fund, which does not exist.

Investigators found almost $597,000 in total withdrawals and unaccounted funds from the guardianship and trust.

Sheedy faces three counts of theft, two as Class C felonies and one as a Class D felony, as well as one count of Class C felony forgery.

“Stacy Sheedy failed not just her profession, she also failed the people for whom she had a fiduciary and ethical obligation to protect,” said Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry.  “This type of theft is unconscionable, and we simply will not tolerate it.  We look forward to vigorously prosecuting this case to its conclusion.”  
 
Sheedy was admitted to practice in Indiana in 1996, according to the Indiana Roll of Attorneys. She was suspended from the practice of law in June 2011 for failing to cooperate with the Disciplinary Commission’s investigation of a grievance filed against her. The Indiana Supreme Court reinstated her on July 26.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT