ILNews

Attorney faces theft and forgery charges

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indianapolis attorney and accountant has been charged with theft and forgery after an investigation revealed the attorney had misappropriated nearly $600,000 in funds from a guardianship account and a family trust account.

The Marion County Prosecutor’s Office says Stacy H. Sheedy, 51, made questionable withdrawals on the estate of an elderly woman who is in a nursing home diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Sheedy was appointed guardian of the woman’s estate in May 2010 and received funds from another guardian in December 2010. Sheedy allegedly did not deposit all of the money into the proper accounts and there were multiple questionable withdrawals. She was removed as guardian in April 2011 and ordered to repay $120,000.

During the course of the investigation into Sheedy’s conduct in the guardianship case, investigators discovered other suspicious transactions stemming from Sheedy’s role as trustee of a family trust. In November 2007, Sheedy became the trustee of a family trust valued at nearly $500,000; the trust now has a present value of $168. When family members questioned why they were no longer receiving brokerage statements from the account, Sheedy told them she had invested the funds in a bond fund. She provided them with statements from the “Wealth Council Indiana Small Cap Bond” fund, which does not exist.

Investigators found almost $597,000 in total withdrawals and unaccounted funds from the guardianship and trust.

Sheedy faces three counts of theft, two as Class C felonies and one as a Class D felony, as well as one count of Class C felony forgery.

“Stacy Sheedy failed not just her profession, she also failed the people for whom she had a fiduciary and ethical obligation to protect,” said Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry.  “This type of theft is unconscionable, and we simply will not tolerate it.  We look forward to vigorously prosecuting this case to its conclusion.”  
 
Sheedy was admitted to practice in Indiana in 1996, according to the Indiana Roll of Attorneys. She was suspended from the practice of law in June 2011 for failing to cooperate with the Disciplinary Commission’s investigation of a grievance filed against her. The Indiana Supreme Court reinstated her on July 26.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.

ADVERTISEMENT