Lawyers and law firms participating in this year’s March Against Hunger raised the equivalent of 135 tons of food,
a record amount for the competition that’s in its fourth year.
Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller teamed up with the Indiana State Bar Association and Feeding Indiana’s Hungry
to create the friendly competition. Fifty-one legal groups from Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio competed to raise the largest amounts
of monetary and food donations. Donations totaled 11,229 pounds of food and $51,172.
The competitors are separated into five divisions, with winners in each division receiving the Attorney General’s Cup.
This year, Barnes & Thornburg won in the large division by collecting 946 pounds of food and more than $16,000.
Burke Costanza & Carberry in Merrillville won in the Medium Division by collecting 758 pounds of food and more than $4,000.
Delk McNally in Muncie won the Small Division by collecting $800. Steven Douglas Law Office in Bloomington won in the Sole
Proprietor Division by collecting 2,590 pounds of food and more than $1,100. The Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office
won in the Public/Nonprofit Division, collecting 1,211 pounds of food and more than $2,200.
“Lawyers are known for being competitive, and they have risen to the challenge of meeting the increased needs of the
people of our state and also have helped elevate the public awareness of hunger in Indiana," Zoeller said.
Last year, 50 legal entities from Indiana and Kentucky collected more than 6,000 pounds of food and $27,574, which combined
is the equivalent of 72 tons of food assistance.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!