ILNews

Attorneys urged to learn court technology

Michael W. Hoskins
January 1, 2008
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Ever worried about what happens if you don't know, understand, or use courtroom technology correctly in preparing for trial?

A new video from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana offers a glimpse into the possibilities, from the dramatic portrayal of a federal judge dozing off during trial to a nervous attorney sweating profusely in court when jurors and courtroom staff can't hear him.

After updating its Web site and revising a video on the Video Evidence Presentation System late last year, the court is using the month of April to urge attorneys to view the video and learn about using court technology to their benefit in preparing for litigation. The video is available online here, and the court is hosting two seminars in the next week to help familiarize trial counsel with available technology.

The online video is divided into nine categories and shows a trio of attorneys preparing for a trial before Chief Judge David F. Hamilton. The video uses dramatics to show one of the attorneys covered in sweat while addressing the jury, Judge Hamilton dozing in his chair, and an introduction by Judge John D. Tinder - now on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - who talks about the importance of technology.

The video gives attorneys an introduction to the VEPS, explains its benefits, and offers tips on preparing for trials, according to court historian Doria Lynch. The court's aim is to have as many attorneys as possible trained on the system.

Jill Zengler, an assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District, demonstrates how to use the pod and document camera, while John Maley with Barnes & Thornburg explains using the video recorder and witness touchscreens, Kathleen DeLaney of DeLaney & DeLaney discusses laptop connectors, and Offer Korin of Katz & Korin discusses audio devices.

Aside from viewing the video online, attorneys can also attend two seminars this month on courtroom technology. An Inns of Court seminar set for 7 p.m. Thursday at the Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis is called "Enhancing Professional and Trial Skills Through the Use of Technology." Another at 10:30 a.m. April 15 will be an Indiana Continuing Legal Education Foundation employment litigation program on how trial counsel must be familiar with that technology. That seminar is at the ICLEF conference facility at 230 E. Ohio St., Indianapolis.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT