Recent Articles
Sidebars: Unassuming storefront houses flavorful Mexican food
April 10, 2013
We give La Escollera 3.25 gavels!
MoreSidebars: Unique Pure Eatery offers options for all types of diners
February 27, 2013
We give Pure Eatery 3.5 gavels!
MoreSidebars: 'The Local' features the best of Indiana home-grown foods
November 21, 2012
We give the restaurant 3.5 gavels!
MoreSidebars: La Margarita is anything but traditional Mexican food
October 24, 2012
We give La Margarita 3 1/2 gavels!
MoreSidebars: Rushville restaurant offers variety of dining options, treats
July 18, 2012
Sidebars columnist Jennifer Lukemeyer reviews a summertime dining escape near the Rushville Courthouse.
MoreSidebars: Indianapolis pizza place provides different lunch option
May 23, 2012
We give Coal Pizza Company 3.25 gavels!
MoreSidebars: Restaurant's sandwiches fail to impress diners
April 25, 2012
We give Forkey's in Martinsville 1.5 gavels!
MoreSidebars: Restaurant built on lifelong family traditions
March 14, 2012
Jennifer Lukemeyer and Fredrick Vaiana give Maxine's Chicken and Waffles three gavels on the food but four when it comes to
the motivation of those honoring Maxine and Ollie’s obvious love for their children.
MoreSidebars: Super sandwich list misses the mark
January 18, 2012
Frederick Vaiana suggests what sandwiches should have made the list of the state's top 46 sandwiches.
MoreSidebars: Chef Joseph's provides sophisticated dining
December 21, 2011
We give Chef Joseph's 3 1/2 gavels!
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.