ILNews

Bankruptcy filings down in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Throughout Indiana, bankruptcy filings fell last year as compared to 2010 – filings in the Indianapolis area fell 17 percent last year, more than in the nation as a whole – but attorneys don’t see an improving economy in those figures.

They say the decline was driven more by stalled foreclosure proceedings.

“The drop in mortgage foreclosures and sales definitely impacted filings,” said John Petr, an attorney at Kroger Gardis & Regas and a Chapter 7 trustee for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana. “That deadline to stay in the home wasn’t there.”

There were 22,754 cases filed in the Southern District in 2011, compared with 27,394 the prior year. The district encompasses the southern two-thirds of the state and has offices in Terre Haute, New Albany and Indianapolis, where most of the cases were filed.

The caseload dipped below the 2008 level but remained higher than 2007, the last year before the recession, when 18,733 cases were filed.

It appears the number of filings has also declined in the northern part of the state. Through November 2011, 14,483 cases were filed in the Northern District of Indiana – which has divisions in Fort Wayne, Hammond and South Bend. In 2010, the Northern District had 18,286 case filings, according to its website. December figures weren’t available from the Northern District as of IL deadline.

Nationwide, bankruptcy filings declined 12 percent, to 1.38 million, the American Bankruptcy Institute in Alexandria, Va., reported.
bankruptcy
Banks halted foreclosures last year after they were caught processing earlier cases illegally – the so-called “robo-signing” controversy. The still-depressed housing market is an added incentive for banks to hold off on foreclosures, instead of adding more vacant houses to their portfolios.

Attorneys said they expect filings to rise this year, as banks start to push through foreclosures again.

“The pipeline of cases I have is probably bigger than it’s ever been,” Noblesville-based bankruptcy attorney Jonathan Brown said.

Mark Zuckerberg, who has the largest personal bankruptcy practice in Indiana, thinks attorneys will begin to see consumers who walked away from houses that are worth less than the outstanding debt. Even after selling an “underwater” house, banks want to collect the difference from someone, Zuckerberg said.

He thinks many Hoosiers are avoiding bankruptcy because they’ve given up hope. With no jobs or savings, they see no assets worth protecting when creditors come knocking.

“You ever heard the phrase, ‘You can’t get blood from a turnip?’” Zuckerberg said. “A lot of these people are turnips, and there’s nothing that can be done to them.”

Another factor in the decline is a reduction in household debt, said Samuel Gerdano, executive director of the American Bankruptcy Institute. He said consumers are spending less and have less access to credit.

The most common form of bankruptcy filing is Chapter 7, which is used by both consumers and business owners to erase debt and start fresh, followed by Chapter 13, in which a debtor sets up a repayment plan.

Large businesses typically reorganize under Chapter 11.

Nationally, business filings fell further than consumer filings, the American Bankruptcy Institute said. Using data provided by Epiq Systems Inc., ABI reported a 19-percent decline in business filings, which included both Chapter 11 and Chapter 7, versus an 11-percent drop for consumers.

Data from the Southern District of Indiana showed a similar trend. There were 84 Chapter 11 filings last year, down 26 percent from 115 in 2010. In 2010, the Northern District reported 64 Chapter 11 filings; through November 2011, there were just 30.

Henry Efroymson, chairman of the bankruptcy practice group at Ice Miller, said many of his business clients are beginning to see better times after suffering since 2007.

Another factor, he said, is, “There is a lot of forbearance activity going on,” as lenders hope they’ll be repaid once the economy improves.

Jim Carlberg, chairman of the Bankruptcy and Creditors’ Rights Group at Bose McKinney & Evans, doesn’t think the economy is improving fast enough to help most businesses.

After three years of dealing with commercial real estate, he expects to see other types of businesses in court this year.

“I think it could run the gamut of retail, manufacturing, distribution, everything other than real estate,” Carlberg said.

Many small businesses that were vulnerable to the recession succumbed to Chapter 7 in 2009 or 2010, which partly explains the decline last year, Petr said.

Even in a thriving economy, bankruptcy is a steady practice because the “big three” — divorce, medical bills and unemployment — never disappear, said Brown, the Noblesville bankruptcy attorney.

Medical bills were what tripped up a McCordsville couple Brown represented at a creditors’ hearing this month. Though the couple, who did not want to be named, had a pension, medical benefits and part-time jobs, they underwent surgeries with huge out-of-pocket expenses.

The problem compounded because they paid the bills with high-interest credit cards, the husband said. “We’ve always paid the minimum amount. We just got into a rut.”•

__________

This story originally ran in the Jan. 16-22, 2012, issue of Indianapolis Business Journal.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT