ILNews

Bankruptcy filings down in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Throughout Indiana, bankruptcy filings fell last year as compared to 2010 – filings in the Indianapolis area fell 17 percent last year, more than in the nation as a whole – but attorneys don’t see an improving economy in those figures.

They say the decline was driven more by stalled foreclosure proceedings.

“The drop in mortgage foreclosures and sales definitely impacted filings,” said John Petr, an attorney at Kroger Gardis & Regas and a Chapter 7 trustee for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana. “That deadline to stay in the home wasn’t there.”

There were 22,754 cases filed in the Southern District in 2011, compared with 27,394 the prior year. The district encompasses the southern two-thirds of the state and has offices in Terre Haute, New Albany and Indianapolis, where most of the cases were filed.

The caseload dipped below the 2008 level but remained higher than 2007, the last year before the recession, when 18,733 cases were filed.

It appears the number of filings has also declined in the northern part of the state. Through November 2011, 14,483 cases were filed in the Northern District of Indiana – which has divisions in Fort Wayne, Hammond and South Bend. In 2010, the Northern District had 18,286 case filings, according to its website. December figures weren’t available from the Northern District as of IL deadline.

Nationwide, bankruptcy filings declined 12 percent, to 1.38 million, the American Bankruptcy Institute in Alexandria, Va., reported.
bankruptcy
Banks halted foreclosures last year after they were caught processing earlier cases illegally – the so-called “robo-signing” controversy. The still-depressed housing market is an added incentive for banks to hold off on foreclosures, instead of adding more vacant houses to their portfolios.

Attorneys said they expect filings to rise this year, as banks start to push through foreclosures again.

“The pipeline of cases I have is probably bigger than it’s ever been,” Noblesville-based bankruptcy attorney Jonathan Brown said.

Mark Zuckerberg, who has the largest personal bankruptcy practice in Indiana, thinks attorneys will begin to see consumers who walked away from houses that are worth less than the outstanding debt. Even after selling an “underwater” house, banks want to collect the difference from someone, Zuckerberg said.

He thinks many Hoosiers are avoiding bankruptcy because they’ve given up hope. With no jobs or savings, they see no assets worth protecting when creditors come knocking.

“You ever heard the phrase, ‘You can’t get blood from a turnip?’” Zuckerberg said. “A lot of these people are turnips, and there’s nothing that can be done to them.”

Another factor in the decline is a reduction in household debt, said Samuel Gerdano, executive director of the American Bankruptcy Institute. He said consumers are spending less and have less access to credit.

The most common form of bankruptcy filing is Chapter 7, which is used by both consumers and business owners to erase debt and start fresh, followed by Chapter 13, in which a debtor sets up a repayment plan.

Large businesses typically reorganize under Chapter 11.

Nationally, business filings fell further than consumer filings, the American Bankruptcy Institute said. Using data provided by Epiq Systems Inc., ABI reported a 19-percent decline in business filings, which included both Chapter 11 and Chapter 7, versus an 11-percent drop for consumers.

Data from the Southern District of Indiana showed a similar trend. There were 84 Chapter 11 filings last year, down 26 percent from 115 in 2010. In 2010, the Northern District reported 64 Chapter 11 filings; through November 2011, there were just 30.

Henry Efroymson, chairman of the bankruptcy practice group at Ice Miller, said many of his business clients are beginning to see better times after suffering since 2007.

Another factor, he said, is, “There is a lot of forbearance activity going on,” as lenders hope they’ll be repaid once the economy improves.

Jim Carlberg, chairman of the Bankruptcy and Creditors’ Rights Group at Bose McKinney & Evans, doesn’t think the economy is improving fast enough to help most businesses.

After three years of dealing with commercial real estate, he expects to see other types of businesses in court this year.

“I think it could run the gamut of retail, manufacturing, distribution, everything other than real estate,” Carlberg said.

Many small businesses that were vulnerable to the recession succumbed to Chapter 7 in 2009 or 2010, which partly explains the decline last year, Petr said.

Even in a thriving economy, bankruptcy is a steady practice because the “big three” — divorce, medical bills and unemployment — never disappear, said Brown, the Noblesville bankruptcy attorney.

Medical bills were what tripped up a McCordsville couple Brown represented at a creditors’ hearing this month. Though the couple, who did not want to be named, had a pension, medical benefits and part-time jobs, they underwent surgeries with huge out-of-pocket expenses.

The problem compounded because they paid the bills with high-interest credit cards, the husband said. “We’ve always paid the minimum amount. We just got into a rut.”•

__________

This story originally ran in the Jan. 16-22, 2012, issue of Indianapolis Business Journal.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT