ILNews

Bankruptcy filings ease slightly in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Total bankruptcy filings in the Southern District of Indiana ticked down last year. Business bankruptcies in Indiana dropped 3.2 percent.

Bankruptcy filings in Indiana dipped slightly in 2010—the first decline in four years—and showed a late-year slowdown that may indicate consumers are starting to manage their finances better.

Filings in the Southern District of Indiana totaled 28,901 last year, a slight 0.2-percent decrease from 2009, according to statistics released earlier this month by the Alexandria, Va.-based American Bankruptcy Institute.

Total bankruptcy filings in the district fell last year for the first time since 2006, a year after bankruptcy reform became law.

Even so, Mark Zuckerberg said his local bankruptcy practice continues to thrive.

“It’s still a little harder to file,” he said, referring to 2005 reform that made it more difficult to wipe away debt. “But if they’ve lost their job or can’t pay their bills, they still have to do something.”

Statewide, total bankruptcies in 2010 dipped to 47,304, a 2-percent decline from 2009, according to ABI.

Indiana still ranked 10th in the nation last year in terms of total bankruptcy filings. California (260,210), Florida (113,066) and Illinois (82,669) topped the list.

Signs of a downward trend may have become more pronounced late last year. Filings in the fourth quarter of 2010 dropped to 6,164 in the district, a nearly 7-percent decline from the same quarter the previous year. Statewide, fourth-quarter filings fell from 11,081 to 9,941, a 10-percent drop.

Total bankruptcy filings in the United States increased to nearly 1.6 million in 2010, an 8-percent increase from the previous year, ABI said. But the growth rate of bankruptcy filings eased after three years of double-digit growth.

“The slowing of the growth rate of bankruptcies reflects a retrenchment in consumer spending associated with a down U.S. economy,” ABI Executive Director Samuel J. Gerdano said in a written statement.

Business bankruptcies nationwide decreased 7.5 percent in 2010, to 56,282. Chapter 11 filings dropped the most, falling 14 percent last year, to 11,774.

In Indiana, business bankruptcies totaled 918 in 2010, a 3.2-percent dip from the previous year.

The number of business bankruptcy filings by type—Chapter 7 liquidation and Chapter 11 reorganization—weren’t available for each state or district.

Jerry Ancel, co-chairman of Taft Stettinius & Holliste’s business restructuring group in Indianapolis, said he's seen Chapter 11 filings falling within his practice, but only because businesses often don’t have the means to restructure.

“There hasn’t been a lot of asset-based capital in the past couple of years,” he said. “[Chapter 11] just becomes less of a viable tool.”

Despite the poor economy, total bankruptcy filings in the Southern District still remain relatively low compared with the early years of last decade.

From 2002 to 2004, bankruptcies annually numbered 32,000 to 35,000 before surging to 47,710 in 2005, when bankruptcy reform became law that October.

This story originally ran in the Feb. 28 IBJ Daily.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT