ILNews

Bar associations host free CLE

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bar Crawl

Bar Crawl is Indiana Lawyer’s section highlighting bar association news around the state. We try to include bar association news and trends in our regular stories, but we want to include more news from specialty and county bars. If you’d like to submit an update about your bar association or a photo from an event your bar association has hosted to Indiana Lawyer, or if you have questions about having your bar association news included in the newspaper, please send it to Rebecca Berfanger, rberfanger@ibj.com, along with contact information for any follow up questions at least two weeks in advance of the issue date.

Bar associations and pro bono districts are working together in December and January to promote replays of a CLE for attorneys who want to participate in the annual statewide Talk to a Lawyer Today event taking place Jan. 17, 2011. The CLE, which lawyers are not required to take to participate in the event, originally took place in Indianapolis in October.

This year’s 6-hour CLE, including one hour of ethics, focuses on mental-health law, child support, Social Security disability law, and adoption law.

The CLE is available free of charge or at a reduced cost to participants who sign up for at least one two-hour shift during the Jan. 17 event.

To receive free CLE, districts will also encourage attorneys to agree to take on a pro bono case in addition to participating in TTALT. Attorneys who are not able to take on pro bono work because they are restricted by their jobs, such as city or state attorneys, or those who prefer not to take a pro bono case may be asked to pay a nominal fee to attend the CLE.

Participants in all CLE replays will also receive the book “Commonly Asked Questions about Indiana Law,” which they will be able to reference during their TTALT volunteer experience, and it will be theirs to keep after the Jan. 17 event. The Indianapolis Bar Association has partnered with event organizers for many years to provide this book at no cost to volunteers.

The St. Joseph County Bar Association, which partnered with its pro bono district last year for the January 2010 TTALT event, has continued its Ask a Lawyer series at the St. Joseph County Public Library in downtown South Bend. The latest Ask a Lawyer took place Oct. 28. Volunteers helped more than 60 people, according to the bar association’s November 2010 newsletter.

The CLE replay in South Bend for Pro Bono District 2, which is comprised of Elkhart, Kosciusko, Marshall and St. Joseph counties, took place Dec. 3.

Interested attorneys can still call their local pro bono district plan administrators for more information or to sign up for upcoming CLEs. Contact information is available at http://www.in.gov/judiciary/probono under “Information for attorneys.”

For instance, the Allen County Bar Association will host the CLE replay for Pro Bono District 3, which is comprised of Adams, Allen, DeKalb, Huntington, LaGrange, Noble, Steuben, Whitley, and Wells counties, at their offices in Fort Wayne on Dec. 10 and Jan. 10.

The CLE for District 1, which is comprised of Jasper, Lake, LaPorte, Newton, Porter, Pulaski, and Starke counties, will take place Jan. 14 at Valparaiso University.

District 4, which is comprised of Benton, Carroll, Clinton, Fountain, Montgomery, Tippecanoe, Warren, and White counties, hosted a CLE Dec. 3, and plans to host a second program Dec. 10 at the offices of Indiana Legal Services in Lafayette.

District 10, which is comprised of Greene, Lawrence, Monroe, and Owen counties, will host a CLE Dec. 10 at the Monroe County Public Library in Bloomington.

More information is also available on the state bar’s website, www.inbar.org, under Legal News.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT