A man recently released from prison after DNA evidence proved his innocence may receive $100,000 if one Indiana representative's
bill passes.
Rep. Vern Tincher, D-Terre Haute, has proposed House Bill 1162 to provide relief to David. L. Scott, who went to prison after
being convicted of murdering 89-year-old W. Terre Haute resident Loretta Keith in 1984.
According to news reports, Scott was convicted largely in part because of a taped admission he made saying he killed Keith.
Scott, a special needs student, was 17 years old when he was sent to prison for 80 years. The Indiana Supreme Court upheld
his conviction, but reduced his sentence to 50 years.
DNA evidence eventually cleared Scott and he was released from prison in 2008.
Scott's story came to the attention of Tincher after he received an e-mail from his local television station asking legislators
what they could do for Scott. Tincher asked for an interim study committee on compensation for wrongful incarceration as well
as expungement of someone's criminal history record when they are released from prison based on DNA evidence.
"We had our day with the policy sentencing commission and had several people testify," Tincher said. "They
chose to take no action. I had a bill drafted that provides compensation to David Scott on humanitarian purposes."
The bill specifies that the $100,000 in relief is not payment of damages but is provided only for "humanitarian consideration
for the wrongs done to David L. Scott." Tincher said the amount, which would come from the state general fund, is
minimal compensation, but will allow him to get on with his life.
Tincher said 21 states, plus Washington, D.C., and the federal government have statutory laws addressing compensation for
people who have been wrongfully convicted and incarcerated, but he decided to tailor this bill just for Scott instead of one
that would generally compensate people wrongfully convicted. He did say he may pursue a bill like that in the future.
"I believe we are going to have more individuals released from incarceration based on DNA evidence," Tincher said.
"Most cases, even as recent as 10 to 15 years ago, didn't have all the capabilities of testing DNA as they do now."
HB 1162 has been assigned to the House Committee on Public Policy. The Scott case also prompted Tincher to author HB 1163,
which deals with expungement of a criminal history record for someone who has been released from prison based on DNA evidence.
That bill is before the House Committee on Courts and Criminal Codes.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.